Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21129 (KAR)

SRI GUBBI HUCHAIAH v. SRI SIDDALINGAIAH

RSA/576/2018 · 2026-06-12

V Srishananda

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28918 RSA No. 576 of 2018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.576 OF 2018 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI GUBBI HUCHAIAH S/O LATE KANNIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS R/A CHIKKONAHALLY MAJARE KADEPALYA KASABA HOBLI GUBBI TALUK-572 216 …APPELLANT (BY SRI N SURESHA, ADVOCATE -ABSENT) AND: 1. SRI SIDDALINGAIAH S/O LATE KANNIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS 2. SRI SHIVAKUMAR S/O GUBBI HUCHAIAH AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS 2. SRI HARIYANNA S/O LATE KANNIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS 3. SRI SIDDANARASAIAH S/O LATE KANNIGAIAH AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT CHIKKONAHALLI MAJARE KADAPALYA Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28918 RSA No. 576 of 2018 GUBBI TALUK – 572 216. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.V.GANGADHARAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R1; R2, R3 ARE SERVED; VIDE ORDER DATED 02.06.2026, APPEAL STANDS DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION IN RESPECT OF DECEASED R4) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE ORDER DTD 14.09.2015 PASSED ON IA IN RA.NO.01/2011, ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI ALLOWING THE APPLICATION AND ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.11.2010 PASSED IN O.S.NO.154/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL JUDGMENT Case called twice. None present on behalf of the appellant. Sri A.V. Gangadharappa, learned counsel for the respondent No.1 is present. 2. Matter was adjourned from 11.06.2022 to today. Earlier also the counsel for the appellant has sought for time and this Court has accommodated the appellant. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28918 RSA No. 576 of 2018 3. Taking note of the fact that counsel for appellant is consistently absent, appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE MR List No.: 1 Sly No.: 56