Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21128 (CAL)

SAROJ KUMAR SAHOO AND ORS v. COAL INDIA LTD AND ORS

MAT/223/2026 · 2026-05-20

Madhuresh Prasad, Prasenjit Biswas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Ct. No.4 D/L 20.05.2026 (Naba) 06 M.A.T. 223 of 2026 With CAN 1 of 2026 Saroj Kumar Sahoo & Ors. Vs. Coal India Limited & Ors. Mr. Kushal Chatterjee, Mr. Atanu Haldar, Ms. Runa Laila Khatun ...for the Appellants Mr. Shamit Sanyal, Ms. Manika Roy, Mr. Sourajit Mukherjee, Mr. Atanu Sur ...for the Respondents 1. After some arguments, the learned advocate for the appellants submits that he would be approaching the Trial Court in the pending writ proceeding. This Court should direct the learned Single Judge Bench for expeditious consideration. 2. We find no reason to express any opinion on such submission having regard to the fact that the petitioner by the impugned order dated 29.01.2026 passed by the Writ Court was granted liberty to mention the matter after exchange of affidavits. 3. The appeal is disposed of. 4. Pending application also stands disposed of. 5. We make it clear that we have not expressed our opinion on the merits of the matter. (Madhuresh Prasad, J.) (Prasenjit Biswas, J.)