APHC010268452019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 12210/2019 Between: 1. KANDULA ELIGIBETH RANI,, W/O PEDDA ANKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O PRAKASHNAGAR, END OF SANTHINAGAR LANE, DOOR NO. 77-50-14/5A, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, THE STATE OF A.P. REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE DIVISIONAL POLICE OFFICER DSP, GUDIWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4.THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PAMARRU P.S. , PAMARRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PAMARRU P.S. , PAMARRU MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 4 not considering the representation dated 25.02.2019 of the petitioner is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law and further direct the respondents consider and pass appropriate orders on the above representation dated 25.02.2019 of the petitioner and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider and dispose of the petitioner's Representation dated 25.02.2019 within two weeks and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V V KOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. G P FOR HOME The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.12210 of 2019 ORDER: When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing the respondents, placed written instructions before this Court and submitted that the charge sheet was filed on 19.09.2019 vide C.C. No. 668 of 2019 on the file of the learned Additional Judicial First Class Magistrate, Gudivada, and that the case was compromised in the Lok Adalat on 11.02.2023. Therefore, it was contended that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for further adjudication and that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri T. Satyanarayana, learned counsel appearing for Sri T.V.V. Koteswara Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, submitted that, in light of the submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the cause of action in the writ petition has become infructuous and prayed that this Court may pass appropriate orders. 3. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the writ petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 22nd January, 2026 cbn 5 130 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 12210 OF 2019 22nd January, 2026 cbn