Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21114 (AP)

S. Ravi Shankar v. Professor K. Satyavelu Reddy

CC/598/2014 · 2026-03-17

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010259932014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 598/2014 Between: 1. S. RAVI SHANKAR,, S/O. LATE S. NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS R/O. H.NO. 5-5-299, SAROJINIDEVI LAY-OUT TIRUPATHI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. PROFESSOR K SATYAVELU REDDY, REGISTRAR, SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY TIRUPATHI 2. PROFESSOR W RAJENDRA, VICE CHANCELLOR & CHAIRMAN OF EXECUTIVE COUNCIL, SRI VENKATESWARA UNIVERSITY TIRUPATHI ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents herein under Section 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful disobedience of the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court in CC No. 1292 of 2013 dated 25.10.2013, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. PARTY-IN-PERSON 2 Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. (SC FOR SVU) P GOVIND REDDY The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that Writ Petition No.8405 of 2013 was dismissed for non-prosecution by this Court by an order dated 22.11.2025. In view of the said order and the dismissal of the writ petition for non-prosecution, nothing further survives for consideration in the present contempt proceedings. 2. Accordingly, this Court is of the considered opinion that nothing further remains for adjudication, the present contempt case stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:18.03.2026 PNS