Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21112 (RAJ)

SANGITA D/O BODURAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1700/2025 · 2026-01-05

Anil Kumar Upman

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:31] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1700/2025 1. Sangita D/o Boduram, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Ward No. 1, Khora Larkhani, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. Ramlal Meena S/o Kaluram Meena, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Khatepura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 4. The Superintendent Of Police, Jaipur Rural. 5. The Sho, Police Station Shahpura, District Jaipur. 6. The Sho, Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur. 7. Babu Lamba S/o Budram, Residing At Ward No. 1, Khora Larkhani, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. 8. Smt. Santi Devi W/o Budram, Residing At Ward No. 1, Khora Larkhani, District Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 05/01/2026 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos. 7 & 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. [2026:RJ-JP:31] (2 of 2) [CRLW-1700/2025] 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan Bapu Nagar, Lal Kothi, Jaipur on 17.12.2025 and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Nagar Nigam, Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.7 & 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.6-Station House Officer, Police Station Bassi, District Jaipur and respondent No.6 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /466