` 208 (2 case) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Karamjit Singh and others State of Haryana and others Vijender Singh and others State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE Present: Mr. Ankur Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, Mr. Sakal Sikri, Advocate and Mr. Siddhanth Arora, Advocate for the appellants/petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Rahil Mah ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. The appellants/petitioners are holding ‘Current Duty Charge’ wherein the posts be filled as per Transfer Policy. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-1145 Date of Decision: 2 Karamjit Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others CWP-9065 Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 Vijender Singh and others Vs. State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, Mr. Sakal Sikri, Advocate and Mr. Siddhanth Arora, Advocate for the appellants/petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana. Mr. Rahil Mahajan, Advocate for the applicants. *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA, J. (Oral) The appellants/petitioners are holding ‘Current Duty Charge’. They are aggrieved by the online Transfer Policy, wherein the posts occupied by them are being treated as vacant and are be filled as per Transfer Policy. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1145-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 …Appellants …Respondents 9065-2026 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.05.2026 …Petitioners …Respondents ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA ROHIT KAPOOR Mr. Ankur Mittal, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kushaldeep Kaur, Advocate, Mr. Siddhanth Arora, Advocate for the appellants/petitioners. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. AG, Haryana. ajan, Advocate for the applicants. The appellants/petitioners are holding charge of higher post under . They are aggrieved by the online Transfer Policy, occupied by them are being treated as vacant and are sought charge of higher post under . They are aggrieved by the online Transfer Policy, sought to RAJESH KUMAR 2026.05.30 12:51 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. LPA-1145-2026 (O&M) [2] 2. The Online Transfer Policy was otherwise challenged in Writ Petition No.7092-2026, on various grounds. On 21.05.2026, the aforesaid writ petition was disposed of in the light of statement made by the learned Advocate General, Haryana that the State would formulate an appropriate Transfer Policy on rational consideration, afresh. 3. Once that be the position, we are of the view that the present appeal/writ petition can also be disposed of with the observation that while formulating the Transfer Policy, afresh, the concerns raised by the persons such as the present appellants/petitioners, who are holding the posts under ‘Current Duty Charge', would also be taken note of. Such consideration by the State shall not be hindered by any observations made by the learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment. 4. The appeal/writ petition are accordingly disposed of. 5. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (ROHIT KAPOOR) 29.05.2026 JUDGE rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? : Yes/No 2. Whether reportable? : Yes/No RAJESH KUMAR 2026.05.30 12:51 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.