Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21108 (CHH)

BIBHUTI BHUSHAN PANDA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2839/2026 · 2026-06-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 (WPC No. 2839 of 2026) 2026:CGHC:23623 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2839 of 2026 1 - Bibhuti Bhushan Panda S/o Banshidhar Panda Aged About 48 Years R/o Padum Nagar, Village- Charoda, Tahsil- Bhilai-3, District- Durg (C.G.)(Particular Of The Petitioner Is Not Mentioned Properly In The Impugned Order And Other Various Documents) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Revenue Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) 3 - Tahsildar Bhilai-3, District Durg (C.G.) 4 - Revenue Inspector Circle 03, Tahsil Bhilai-3, District Durg (C.G.) 5 - Halka Patwari Halka No. 09, Village Charoda, Tahsil Bhilai-3, District Durg (C.G.) 6 - Rupesh Kumar Verma S/o Shri Balbhadra Singh Verma Aged About 35 Years R/o Shanti Nagar, Bhilai-03, Tehsil- Patan, District- Durg (C.G.) 7 - Chhattisgarh Vikas Grih Nirman Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Bhilai 03, Charoda (C.G.) Through Manager Office Chhattisgarh Sadan Shop No. 02, Sector 01, Bhilai Nagar, Durg, District- Durg (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner(s) :- Mr. Goutam Khetrapal, Advocate appeared through virtual mode ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2026.06.12 11:42:15 +0530 2 (WPC No. 2839 of 2026) For Respondent-State :- Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Government Advocate ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SB - Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order On Board 11.06.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already approached the Sub Divisional Officer, Revenue, Bhilai-3, District Durg by filing an appeal against the impugned order and therefore, he is not pressing the present writ petition. 2. On the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge @d!t!