Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21106 (AP)

A Naga Suresh v. Sri Kona Sasidhar, IAS.

CC/1333/2025 · 2026-03-06

Kiranmayee Mandava, Ninala Jayasurya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010258602025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3503] SATURDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1333/2025 Between: 1. A NAGA SURESH,, S/O.KOTESWARA RAO AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC LECTURER SATHAVAHANA COLLEGE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KONA SASIDHAR IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. DR NARAYANA BHARATH GUPTA IAS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. COMMISSIONER OF COLLEGIATE EDUCATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD, NOW FUNCTIONING AT PRASADAMPADU, VIJAYAWADA, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondent herein under the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for deliberately disobeying the order of this Hon'ble Court passed in W.A. No. 633 of 2022 dated 01.10.2024 by not obeying the same and for his conduct in bringing down the dignity and majesty of this Hon'ble Court 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P NARAHARI BABU Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: 3 The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ninala Jayasurya) At the time of considering the matter, Mr. Rama Chandra Rao Gurram, learned counsel representing the respondents, placed a copy of the proceedings dated 27.02.2026 addressed by the Commissioner of Collegiate Education, Andhra Pradesh, Mangalagiri, for the perusal of this Court. 2. He submits that in view of the said proceedings dated 27.02.2026 the orders passed by this Court in W.A.No.633 of 2022 have been complied with. He also submits that a formal affidavit explaining the delay in issuing the proceedings however has not been filed. Be that as it may. In the light of the impugned proceedings dated 27.02.2026, this Court is not inclined to examine the matter further. 3. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. Needless to observe that the petitioner may work out his remedies against the said proceedings dated 27.02.2026 in accordance with law, if he is so advised. No costs. [ As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ NINALA JAYASURYA, J _________________________ KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA, J 07.03.2026 PNS