M/s Vedik (spat (P) Limited v. rep. by its Managing Director
WP/35287/2012 · 2026-03-08
Ninala Jayasurya
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21105 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21105 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010267492012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 35287/2012 Between:
1. M/S VEDIK (SPAT (P) LIMITED,, PLOT NO. 30, APIIC GOULIPURAM INDUSTRIAL PARK, HINDUPUR MANDAL, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS CHIEF FINANCE OFFICER, K.V. SRINATH.
...PETITIONER AND
1. REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, THE CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, MINT COMPOUND, HYDERABAD.
2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, OPERATION CIRCLE, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED, ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
3. THE SENIOR ACCOUNTS OFFICER, OPERATION CIRCLE, CENTRAL POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LIMITED,' ANANTHAPUR, ANANTHAPUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KIRAN TIRUMALASETTI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. Venkata Rama Rao Kota SC FOR APSPDCL
2. V R REDDY KOVVURI(SC FOR APSPDCL)
3. O MANOHER REDDY
NJS,J W.P No.35287 of 2012 2
The Court made the following Order:
Mr. V Hemanth Kumar, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioner, states that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous.
2. In view of the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim orders, if any, granted on the earlier occasion shall stand vacated. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:09.03.2026 Ksj