IRSAD KHAN @ CHHANGA SON OF RAJAK v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/17185/2025 · 2026-01-16
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21104 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21104 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:1914] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17185/2025 Irsad Khan @ Chhanga Son Of Rajak, Aged About 27 Years, Resident Of Sadpuri Police Station Jaluki District Deeg. (At Present In District Jail, Deeg) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakar, PP with Mr. Anirudh Singh, Astt. Adv.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 16/01/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.70/2024, registered at Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg, for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 148 read with Section 149 and 302 of IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner contended that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Initially, the case was registered under Sections 147, 148 read with Section 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code; however, after investigation, the police did not find and substance to the allegations of murder. It is further contended that the cause of death of the deceased was initially opined to be
[2026:RJ-JP:1914] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-17185/2025] homicidal, but after a thorough investigation and upon obtaining a subsequent medical opinion, the concerned Medical Board concluded that the death was suicidal in nature. It is also submitted that at the time of the alleged occurrence, the presence of the petitioner was not established and the petitioner was found to be present at another place. Despite this, the police, after investigation concluded that due to the conduct of the petitioner deceased has committed suicide, however, the said allegation is also wrong. It is argued that the accused-petitioner is in custody since long and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application.
4. Heard and perused the material available on the record along with the factual report.
5. In the factual report, the Police did not found commission of offence under Sections 302 and 149 of IPC, the death of the deceased was also found to be suicidal, therefore, considering the above facts, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner- Irsad Khan @ Chhanga Son Of Rajak, in connection with FIR No.70/2024, registered at Police Station Jaluki, District Deeg, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the
[2026:RJ-JP:1914] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-17185/2025] satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-209