APHC010254362019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 11435/2019 Between: 1. M/S. TIRUPATI FUELS PVT. LTD., REP.BY ITS MRCHATTERJ, SHIB SHANKAR CHATTERJEE, AGED ABOUT 60, S/O LATE T. C. CHATTERJEE. PLOT NO.21,30,31INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA, NTPC, LANKELAPALEM ROAD, PARAVADA,VISAKHAPATNA ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PARAVADA POLICE STATION, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT 4. JAYASWALNECO INDUSTRIES LIMITED, SILTARA GROWTH CENTRE, NH 200, SILTARA, RAIPUR, CHHATTISGARH - 493111 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ, Order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent police in interfe-ing into the matters of civil nature between the petitioner and 4th respondent governed by contract dt.06- 12-2018 and thereby illegally aiding 4th respondent by providing police force to trespass and cause loss to the petitioner company is illegal arbitrary, violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct respondent police to launch disciplinary action and 2 prosecute officials along with 4th respondent for the offences of trespass and causing wrongful loss to petitioner company and its staff and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent police not to interfere with the petitioner company and its staff activities at the petitioner company factory premises and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. JAVVAJI SARATH CHANDRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.11435 of 2019 ORDER: Ms. Abhigna Mandava, learned counsel representing Sri Javvaji Sarath Chandra, learned counsel for the writ petitioner, would submit that the cause in the Writ Petition does not survive for further adjudication, and the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Sri R. Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, representing respondent Nos.1 to 3, is in attendance. 3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 29th January, 2026 cbn 4 98 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No: 11435 OF 2019 29th January, 2026 cbn