1 2026:CGHC:23738-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No.40 of 2026 1 - Mahendra Dhimar S/o Kunwar Singh Dhimar Aged About 24 Years R/o Shivpara, Durg, P.S. Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Maya Dhimar D/o Rajendra Dhimar Aged About 32 Years R/o Shivpara, Durg, P.S. Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. ... Appellants versus 1 - Gannu Dhimar S/o Mukesh Dhimar Aged About 22 Years R/o In Front Of Bajrang Bali Mandir, Ward No. 35, Shivpara Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Aryan @ Chitra @ Nishant Yadav S/o Late Raju Yadav R/o Near Seven Tamarind Tress, Ward No. 33 Shivpara Durg, Distt. Chhattisgarh. 3 - Surendra @ Bhuru Dhimar S/o Late Rajendra Dhimar R/o Near Seven Tamarind Trees, Ward No. 33 Shivpara Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. (Accused) 4 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, P.S. Durg, Distt. Durg, Chhattisgarh. .. Respondent(s) For Appellants : Shri Ujjawal Agrawal, Advocate For State/Respondent No.4 : Shri Rishi Raj Pithwa, Dy.Govt. Advocate D.B.: Hon’ble Shri Justice Sanjay S. Agrawal & Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Judgment on Board Per Sanjay S. Agrawal, J. 15/06/2026 1) Learned counsel appearing for the appellants does not want to press this appeal, as the impugned judgment of acquittal dated 16/12/2025 SATISH TUMANE Digitally signed by SATISH TUMANE Date: 2026.06.15 18:22:38 +0530 2 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Durg, District Durg (C.G.) in Sessions Trial No.94/2024 acquitting the respondents for the offence punishable under Section 307 read with Section 34 and Section 294 of IPC, has already been affirmed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24/03/2026 passed in CRMP No.831 of 2026. 2) The appeal is accordingly dismissed as not pressed. SD/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) Judge SD/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Tumane