- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27160 WP No. 33724 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO.33724 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: MAITRI SATAPATHY. W/O PRASANJEET PADHY, AGE 34 YEARS, FLAT NO.015, SLV NIWAS, ECC ROAD, WHITEFIELD, BANGALORE - 560 066. REPRESENTED BY THE GPA SRI SANTANU KUMAR SATAPATHY, AGE 64 YEARS, FLAT NO.015, SLV NIWAS, ECC ROAD, WHITEFILED, BANGALORE - 560 066. MOBILE NO.9178300999, EMAIL: SKSATAPATHY2024@GMAIL.COM …PETITIONER (BY SMT.ARCHANA.K - (AMICUS CURIAE)) AND: 1. THE CHIEF MANAGER SBI (MNTC), RACPC BANGALORE CENTRAL, L.C.ROAD, SIVAJI NAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 001. Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27160 WP No. 33724 of 2025 2. SRI. PRASANJEET PADHY, TEAM LEAD, AGE 42 YEARS, ABB GLOBAL INDUSTRIES AND SERVICE PVT. LTD., AIC BRIGADE SOUTH FIELD, KEB COLONY, INDUSTRIAL AREA, HOODI, BANGALORE - 560 048. …RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA BY PARTY-IN-PERSON PRAYING TO A) ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT AND PLEASED TO GRANT THE ORDER OF INJUNCTION ON THE O.S 2413/2025 WHICH WAS GRANTED EARLIER IN THIS CASE TILL THE DISPOSAL OF THE APPEAL NO. RA 51/2025 BEFORE THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE RURAL AT BANGALORE AND DIRECT THE 1ST APPELLATE COURT TO DISPOSE OF THE APPEAL AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE, THIS IS AVAILABLE AT ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27160 WP No. 33724 of 2025 ORAL ORDER The present writ petition is filed questioning the possession notice. A memo has been filed stating that in W.P.No.39390/2025, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 has submitted before the Co-ordinate Bench that the loan amount relating to the home loan had been deposited by respondent No.2 and a Bank statement was also produced. It is stated that the possession notice dated 19.11.2024 is no more existing, which is the main cause of action for filing the writ petition. Hence, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition. In that view of the matter, this Court is passing the following: ORDER (i) Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and the petitioner is at liberty to question any further action initiated by the respondents. (ii) All IAs in this writ petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE SMJ; List No.: 1 Sl No.: 4