Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21095 (AP)

SRI VEGUNTA KRISHNA MOHAN v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/5479/2025 · 2026-02-09

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010263102025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] TUESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.Nos.4 and 5 of 2025 In&and CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5479/2025 Between: Sri Vegunta Krishna Mohan ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused: 1. MANGENA SREE RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: COMMON ORDER: The Petitioner/Accused and the 3rd respondent/wife of the complainant/2nd respondent are present. 2. The Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity, “the Cr.P.C.”) / Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity, “the BNSS”), seeking to quash 2 the conditions in Crl.M.P.No.122 of 2025 in Crl.A.No.56 of 2025 dated 06.05.2025 on the file of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge- cum-Special Court for Trial of offences against Women, West Godawari, West Godavari which is payment of full compensation immediately as ordered by the trial Court in C.C.No.267 of 2014 on the file of the learned Special Judicial Magistrate of First Class (Mobile) for Trial of Cases under PCR Act at Eluru, Dated 24.03.2025, registered for the alleged offence punishable under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 (for brevity, “the N.I.Act”). 2. The I.A. No.4 of 2025 was filed to permit the petitioner therein to compromise, and I.A. No. 5 of 2025 was filed to record the compromise. 3. A joint memo is filed by the petitioner and the 3rd respondent that a compromise was affected in between the parties at the intervention of the well-wishers of both sides, and that the offence punishable under Section 138 of „the N.I.Act.,‟ is compoundable as per Section 147 of „the N.I.Act‟. 4. In view of the compromise arrived at between the parties, I.A. Nos. 4 and 5 of 2025 are allowed, permitting the parties to compound the offences and recording the compromise arrived at between the petitioner and the 3rd respondent. 5. Recording the above compromise in between the petitioner and 3rd respondent, the Criminal Petition is allowed and the proceedings in Crl.A.No. 56 of 2025 on the file of the learned V Additional District and Sessions Judge- Cum-Special Court for Trial of Offences against Women, West Godavari, are 3 hereby compounded. The petitioners are acquitted under Section 320(8) of „the Cr.P.C‟. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ Dr.Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 10.02.2026 KMS 4 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL PETITION No.5479 of 2025 Date: 10.02.2026 KMS 139