Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21094 (CHH)

BIRENDRA SONI @ BIRENDRA KUMAR SONI v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4507/2026 · 2026-06-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23635 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4507 of 2026 1 - Birendra Soni @ Birendra Kumar Soni S/o Shri Kamta Prasad Soni Aged About 42 Years Posted As Lecturer At Govt. Higher Secondary School Jamgaon, Block - Fingeshwar, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, New Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2 - The Director Public Instructions Directorate Indravati Bhawan Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh 3 - The Joint Director Education Division Raipur Pension Bada, Tahsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh 4 - The Secretary And District Education Officer District Level Rationalization Committee Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ... Respondents [Cause-title taken from Case Information System (CIS)] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For petitioner : Mr. RS Patel, Advocate For Respondent-State : Mr. Avinash Singh, Government Advocate ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal (Order on Board) 11.06.2026 1. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with the liberty to pursue his representation (Annexure-P/06). 2. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that so far as the prayer for withdrawal of the petition is concerned, he has no SAIFAN KHAN Digitally signed by SAIFAN KHAN 2 objection, however, with regard to the prayer for grant of liberty to pursue the representation (Annexure-P/06), he vehemently opposes the same as the said representation of the petitioner has already been rejected by the State Level Committee vide order dated 30.03.2026. 3. On due consideration of the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn without reserving any liberty in favour of the petitioner. sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge s@if