[2026:RJ-JP:2715] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 417/2026 Praveen Kumar S/o Late Shri Ramesh Shankar Agrawal, Aged About 67 Years, R/o 107, Dharampura, Bagh Bhatayari, G.T. Road, Ghaziabad (U.P.) ----Petitioner/Plaintiff Versus 1. Kishor Singh S/o Shri Girvar Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Badgurjaron Ki Dhani, Tan Biharipur, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, P.s. Patan District Sikar (Raj.) 2. Girvar Singh S/o Late Shri Bhagwan Singh, Aged About 62 Years, R/o Badgurjaron Ki Dhani, Tan Biharipur, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana, P.S. Patan District Sikar (Raj.) ----Respondents/Defendants For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Brijendra Singh Kachhawa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Ajay Gupta with Ms. Anushree Agarwal, Ms. Sampati Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 21/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed assailing the order dated 14.11.2025 passed by the learned Additional District Judge No.1, Neem Ka Thana, District Sikar, whereby the application termed as third application filed under Section 65-B of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act of 1872") was rejected. 2. This Court raised a query to learned counsel for the petitioner that whether the documents, for which secondary evidence was being sought, were already a part of the record of the file or not. In response, the learned counsel for the petitioner [2026:RJ-JP:2715] (2 of 2) [CW-417/2026] submits that the documents were not on record and were being filed along with the application under Section 65-B of the Act of 1872. 3. Heard. 4. This Court finds that no permission could be granted to admit secondary evidence if the documents are not already on record, and if the documents have not been properly brought on record before the Court. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner is free to pursue other legal remedies if advised so. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Sudha/2