1 HN, J W.P.No.23479_2013 APHC010238872013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23479/2013 Between: 1. B.KARNA,, S/O.B.KUMARAPPA, AGED 30 YRS., WORKING AS ATTENDER IN K.G.B. VIDYALAYAM, PEDDAKADABUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SECRETARY, ANDHRA PRADESH, RESIDENTIAL INSTITUTIONS OF SOCIETY, (APREIS), HYDERABAD. 2. THE STATE PROJECT DIRECTOR, RAJIV VIDYA MISSION (SSA), A.P.K.G.B.V SOCIETY, A.P. HYDERABAD. 3. THE SPECIAL OFFICER, K.G.B. VIDYALAYAM, PEDDAKADABUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the order passed by the 3rd respondent nil date -07-2013 terminating the petitioner from the service as attender in the 3rd respondent vidyalayam without giving any notice is illegal, arbitrary, high handed and violation of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and also contrary to the circular issued by the 2nd respondent dated 20- 06-2013 and consequently direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as 2 HN, J W.P.No.23479_2013 attender in the 3rd respondent vidyalayam by setting aside the memo passed by the 3rd respondent nil date July 2013 which was served on the petitioner on 30-07-2013 and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 28846 OF 2013 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner as attender in the 3rd respondent vidyalayam by suspending the impugned memo nil date -07-2013 passed by the 3rd respondent pending writ petition before this Hon'ble Court and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 3 HN, J W.P.No.23479_2013 ORDER: 1. It is submitted that the cause in the writ petition does not survive any further for consideration and that nothing remains to be adjudicated in the matter. 2. Recording the said submission, and in view of the fact that no further cause survives in the writ petition, this Court is of the opinion that no further orders are required to be passed. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:31.03.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.23479_2013 264 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 23479 of 2013 Date: 31.03.2026 NKA