Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21090 (AP)

ANJUMAN ISLAMIA LAM v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/13830/2025 · 2026-02-17

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010268942025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 13830/2025 Between: 1. ANJUMAN ISLAMIA LAM, REP., BY ITS PRESIDENT SHAIK HAJARATH AN, S/O. KHASIM AN, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/O.10-33A, MAIN ROAD, LAM VILLAGE, GORANTIA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. SOCIETY ADDRESS 1/LAM VILLAGE, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SHAIK HAJARATH AN, , S/O. KHASIM AN, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, OCC PRESIDENT, R/O.10-33A, MAIN ROAD, LAM, GORANTLA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. . SHAIK MAHABOOB,, S/O. DADA SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS, R/O. 1-75, LAM VILLAGE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, R AND S DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIATE, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL, REGISTRATION AND STAMPS DEPARTMENT, TADEPAILI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUB REGISTRAR, TADIKONDA MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court 2 may be pleased topleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring the action of the 3rd respondent in not receiving, processing and registering the document presented by the petitioner with respect to subject lands admeasuring an extent of an extent of Ac.1.09 cents in Sy.No.14-1A3, an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in Sy.No. 14-1B1, and an extent of Ac.1.30 cents in Sy.No.7-1C situated in Lam village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District as illegal, arbitrary, violation of Article 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and violation of provisions, of Registration Act, 1908and consequently direct the Respondent No.3 to receive, process and register the documents presented by the petitioner with respect to subject lands and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 to receive, and register the document presented by the petitioner with respect to extent of an extent of Ac. 1.09 cents in process subject lands admeasuring an Sy.No.14-1A3, an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in Sy.No. 14-1B1, and an extent of Ac.1.30 cents in Sy.No.7-1C situated in Lam village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District, pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. PRASAD BABU MOGALATHURTI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS 3 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 3rd respondent in not receiving, processing and registering the document presented by the petitioners with respect to the subject lands admeasuring an extent of Ac.1.09 cents in Sy.No.14-1A3, an extent of Ac.0.60 cents in Sy.No.14-1B1 and an extent of Ac.1.30 cents in Sy.No.7-1C situated in Lam Village, Tadikonda Mandal, Guntur District. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter of the 3rd respondent submits that the land in question falls within the jurisdiction of the 3rd respondent and the said documents were never formally presented before the 3rd respondent for registration. The petitioners merely made an enquiry regarding the feasibility of registration. 4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, the petitioners are permitted to submit the relevant documents with respect to the subject lands claimed by the petitioners before the 3rd respondent within a period of two (2) weeks from the date of receipt of this order. On receipt of such documents from the petitioners, the 3rd respondent shall consider the same and pass appropriate orders strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioners 4 giving due opportunity, upon verification of the records and the subject lands, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of three (3) months thereafter. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 18.02.2026 NNN