Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2109 (RAJ)

SHARUKH KHAN S/O JAYSINGH KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2090/2026 · 2026-04-18

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:16384] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2090/2026 Sharukh Khan S/o Jaysingh Khan, R/o Dahar Ka Bas, Sahdoli, Police Station Bagad Tiraha, District Alwar, Rajasthan. (Petitioner Is In Judicial Custody In Central Jail Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Manish Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP Mr. Vinod Samriya, CI, Alwar HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 18/04/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.17/2026 registered at Police Station Bagad, Tiraya, District Alwar for the offences under Sections 318(4), 319(2), 316(2) of BNS and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. It is contended that the petitioner is about 20 years of age and has no criminal antecedents. It is alleged that the petitioner through a mobile phone advertised the sale of a Vivo mobile phone and without delivering the said mobile phone obtained Rs. 10,600/-. It is further submitted that apart from the aforesaid amount no other transaction has been found in the petitioner’s [2026:RJ-JP:16384] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2090/2026] account. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 15.01.2026, and the trial of the case may take considerable time. The charge- sheet has already been submitted before the concerned trial court therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. The Investigating Officer is present in person before the court and submits that the statement of the victim has been recorded and in the said statement, the victim has clearly stated that the petitioner advertised the sale of a Vivo mobile phone and obtained an amount of Rs. 10,650/- without delivering the said mobile phone. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid facts, the bail application deserves to be dismissed 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. The offences alleged to have been committed by the petitioner are exclusively triable by Magistrate. Apart from the solitary incident there are no other criminal antecedents against the petitioner and no cyber complaint has been registered against him on the cyber portal. The petitioner is about 20 years of age. The accused-petitioner is in custody since 15.01.2026 and the trial of the case will take considerable time. The charge-sheet has already been filed, therefore without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Sharukh Khan S/o Jaysingh Khan, in connection with FIR No. 17/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:16384] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2090/2026] registered at Police Station Bagad, Tiraya, District Alwar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J ashu /5