Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2109 (AP)

E MUNEENDRA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/14219/2026 · 2026-05-07

B Krishna Mohan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010272092026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] FRIDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 14219/2026 Between: 1. E MUNEENDRA, S/O. LATE. NADHAMUNI, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC LINEMAN, R/O. D.NO.4-14, MADIGAWADA, KUNTRAPAKAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517561 2. B.NAGAMMA, , W/O. SIDHAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66YEARS, OCC.HOUSEWIFE, R/O. ARUNDHATHI PURAM VILLAGE, PERUMALLAPALLE MANDAL TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUATI DISTRICT-517501 3. E.NAGAMMA,, W/O. VENKATA MUNI, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS,OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. MADIGAWADA, KUNTRAPAKAM, CHITTOOR DISTRICT-517561. 4. J.CHANGL RAYUDU,, S/O. NADIPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62YEARS, OCC COOLIE, R/O. ARUNDHATHI PURAM VILLAGE, PERUMALLAPALLE MANDAL, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUATI DISTRICT-517501 5. J.NALLAIAH,, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58YEARS, OCC SWEEPER NMR DAILY WAGE LABOUR WORKING AT SV UNIVERSITY, R/O. ARUNDHATHI PURAM VILLAGE, PERUMALLAPALLE MANDAL, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUATI DISTRICT-517501. 6. J.NAGAIAH,, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC SWEEPER NMR DAILY WAGE LABOUR WORKING AT SV UNIVERSITY, R/O. ARUNDHATHI PURAM VILLAGE, PERUMALLAPALLE MANDAL, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUATI DISTRICT-517501. 2 7. J.SUDHAKAR,, S/O. SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, OCC GAS MACHANIC NMR DAILY WAGE LABOUR WORKING AT SV UNIVERSITY, R/O. ARUNDHATHI PURAM VILLAGE, PERUMALLAPALLE MANDAL, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUATI DISTRICT-517501. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY ( REVENUE DEPARTMENT), SECRETRIAT, VEIAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI GUNTUR DISTRICT-522237. 2. THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND AND ADMINISTRATION, REP. BY IT COMMISSIONER APPEALS O/O. 1ST AND 3RD FLOORS, APIIC BUILDING AUTO NAGAR, NEAR NRI HOSPITALS, MANGALAGIRL, GUNTUR DISTRICT- 522503 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- 517501. 4. THE JOINT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATI. TIRUPATI PISTRICT- 517501. 5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TIRUPATI REVENUE DIVISION, TIRUPATI DISTRICT- SI7501. 6. THE TAHASILDAR, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT 517601. 7. V CHANDRASEKHAR NAIDU, , S/O. RAMCHANDRA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS. R/O.CHERIOPAILE VILIAGE. PUDIPATIA POST, TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, TIRUPATI DISTRICT-SI 7501 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the land to an extent of Ac.2.48 cents in.No.243/3 of Cherlopalle Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District (erstwhile Chittoor District) pending appeal dated. 15.04.2026 before the 2nd Respondent as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, against the principles 3 of natural justice and consequently direct the Respondents not evict/dispossess the Petitioners from the land to an extent of Ac.2.48 cents in Sy.No.243/3 of Cherlopalle Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District (erstwhile Chittoor District) pending appeal dated. 15.04.2026 before the 2nd Respondent and to pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the Respondents not to evict/dispossess the Petitioners from the land to an extent of Ac.2.48 cents in Sy.No.243/3 of Cherlopalle Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District (erstwhile Chittoor District) pending appeal dated.15.04.2026 before the 2nd Respondent forthwith pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. MAHESWARI ARIKA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ASSIGNMENT 2. GP FOR REVENUE 4 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 6 and the learned counsel appearing for the 7th respondent. 2. This writ petition is filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to dispossess the petitioners from the land to an extent of Ac.2.48 cents in Sy.No.243/3 of Cherlopalle Village, Tirupati Rural Mandal, Tirupati District (erstwhile Chittoor District) pending appeal dated 15.04.2026 before the 2nd respondent. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners preferred appeal before the 2nd respondent dated 15.04.2026 and the same is pending. While so, at the behest of the 7th respondent, the 6th respondent is threatening to dispossess the petitioners. 4. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents submits that the appeal of the petitioners will be dealt with by the 2nd respondent following the due procedure. 5. The learned counsel for the 7th respondent submits that there is an injunction suit pending between the parties before the competent civil court and the ad-interim injunction is in favour of the 7th respondent. 5 6. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, since the appeal is pending before the 2nd respondent, it is just and necessary to dispose of the same in accordance with law to meet the ends of justice. For the said purpose, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and dispose of the appeal of the petitioners dated 15.04.2026 strictly in accordance with law by hearing all the parties concerned including the petitioners and the 7th respondent herein, upon verification of the records and the subject land, appropriate decision shall be taken on its own merits as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (4) months from the date of receipt of this order. In the meanwhile, there shall be an order of status quo as on today to be maintained with respect to the mutation of the names of the parties concerned for the subject land covered under the said appeal. 7. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN 08.05.2026 NNN