Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21087 (CHH)

PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CREDIT COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2837/2026 · 2026-06-10

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:23621 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2837 of 2026 Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society Limited Farfod Reg. No. 646 Through Its Incharge/manager Santosh Kumar Tandan, S/o Kamta Tandan, Aged About 49 Years, R/o 114, Village Barchha, Post Bhansoj, Barchha, Aarang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Cooperative, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh Marketing Federation, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Collector Raipur District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Deputy Commissioner/registrar Cooperative Society, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - District Marketing Officer Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Branch Manager District Central Bank Limited, Aarang, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Ameet Kumar Sharma, Advocate For State/Respondents No.1, 3 & 4 : Mr. Anand Dadariya, Deputy Advocate General For Respondent No.6 : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board 11.06.2026 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled and, therefore, the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.06.11 16:47:23 +0530 2 2. The aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents. 3. In view of the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. In view of the above, I.A. No.02, an application for urgent hearing and I.A. No.03, an application for hearing the case during summer vacation, stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Yogesh