Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21087 (BOM)

SHANTI SURESH PAL v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

IA/3591/2026 · 2026-10-15

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

sg 920.ia(cri)3591-26.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3591 OF 2026 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 619 OF 2026 Shanti Suresh Pal … Applicant versus State of Maharashtra … Respondent ---- Ms. Payoshi Roy, a/w. Ms. Sanskruti Hebalkar, for the Applicant. Mr. Tanveer Khan, APP, for the Respondent/State. ---- CORAM:BHARATI DANGRE & ASHISH S. CHAVAN, JJ. DATE: 15th OCTOBER, 2026 P.C.: 1. The application is moved for modification of the bail order dated 22nd July, 2026, when the Applicant was enlarged on bail upon furnishing a PR bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one or more sureties. Ms. Payoshi Roy, learned Counsel for the Applicant, would submit that the Applicant is unable to fulfill the said condition and, therefore, continues to remain incarcerated despite having been directed to be released on bail on 22nd July, 2026. p. 1 __________________________________________________ SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Digitally signed by SMITA JOHNSON GONSALVES Date: 2026.10.17 16:24:47 +0530 sg 920.ia(cri)3591-26.docx 2. In these circumstances, we deem it appropriate to follow the directives of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Policy Strategy for Grant of Bail, In Re 1 and direct the release of the Applicant on bail through the DLSA, Mumbai. The report be placed before us within period of two weeks from today. Interim application disposed of. (ASHISH S. CHAVAN, J.) (BHARATI DANGRE, J.) 1 (2024) 10 Supreme Court Cases 685 p. 2 __________________________________________________