SMT. PISTA DEVI W/O SIRMOHAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16922/2025 · 2026-01-06
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21086 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21086 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:200] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16922/2025 Smt. Pista Devi W/o Sirmohar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Nahida Ka Pura, Police Station Salempur, District Dausa. (At Present Confined In District Jail Dausa, District Dausa). ----Accused-Petitioner/Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA
Order 06/01/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.159/2025 registered with the Police Station Salempur, District Dausa for offence under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) & 324(4) of B.N.S.,
2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the challan papers.
4. On perusal of the contents of First Information Report, it is revealed that the accused-petitioner has not been named in the F.I.R., though the persons who were involved in the incident have been named in the F.I.R. As per the postmortem report, the
[2026:RJ-JP:200] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16922/2025] cause of death is Coma as a result of ante-mortem head injury and its consequences. There is no allegation against the petitioner of causing the fatal injury. The petitioner is a woman and is in custody since 15.10.2025.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner so also the fact that the petitioner is a woman and there is no any overt act against the petitioner and she is not named in the F.I.R., this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioner on bail.
6. This bail application is, accordingly, allowed and it is
directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /208