Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21084 (CHH)

MAHESH KUMAR SONKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2813/2026 · 2026-06-08

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:23609 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2813 of 2026 1 - Mahesh Kumar Sonkar S/o Shri Patiram Sonkar Aged About 51 Years Occupation- Fad Prabhari, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Achhola, Registration No. 1018, Paddy Procurement Center- Joba R/o Village- Garhseoni Bazar Chowk, Thana Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Hujur Prasad Sahu S/o Shri Balaram Sahu Aged About 45 Years Occupation- Fad Prabhari, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Achhola, Registration No. 1018, Paddy Procurement Center- Achhola R/o Village- Anandpara Bhoring Ward No. 15 Achholi, Thana, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, C.G. 3 - District Co-Operative Markfed Officer Mahasamund District Mahasamund, C.G. 4 - Deputy Commissioner /Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Society Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, C.G. 5 - Branch Manager Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur Branch Tumgaon, District Mahasamund, C.G. 6 - Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Achhola Registration No. 1018, Through Its Prescribed Officer, Gramin Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Achhola, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.06.09 14:40:32 +0530 2 / 2 ... Respondents For Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate appears through Video Conferencing For State /Respondents No.1 &2 : Ms. Shailja Shukla, GA For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 09/06/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take recourse of law available to them. 2. Not opposed by the Respondent counsel. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. SD/- SD/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE ashu