Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21080 (RAJ)

DHRUV KUMAR S/O RAJKUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/16999/2025 · 2026-01-07

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:354] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16787/2025 1. Sachin S/o Suresh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Ugalan, Police Station Baas, District Hisar (Hariyana) (At Present In District Jail, Dausa). 2. Vipin S/o Ramesh, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Ugalan, Police Station Baas, District Hisar (Hariyana) (At Present In District Jail, Dausa). ----Petitioners Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16999/2025 Dhruv Kumar S/o Rajkumar, Aged About 22 Years, R/o House No. 1377/31, Ward No. 21, Kamlanagar, Rohtak Thana, Shiwani Colony, District Rohtak (Haryana) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In District Jail Dausa). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajender Singh Rathore Mr. Ravi Jangir For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 07/01/2026 1. Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.129/2025 registered with the Police Station Nangal Rajawatan, District Dausa for [2026:RJ-JP:354] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16787/2025] offence under Sections 111(2)(b) & 111(4) of B.N.S., 2023 and sections 3 & 25 of Arms Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 4. The allegation against the petitioners is of recovery of some firearms of which they were not having any license. The accused petitioners are said to be in custody since 21.09.2025 and there are no criminal antecedents against them. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and so also the fact that the Police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:354] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16787/2025] 7. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected bail application. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /205-206