Beedilli Prakash v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented through its
WP/12247/2014 · 2026-03-02
Harinath N
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21077 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21077 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010255092014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12247 OF 2014 Between:
1. BEEDILLI PRAKASH, S/O ABBULU, AGED 36 YEARS, OCCUPATION:
DRIVER, APSRTC RAZOLE DEPOT, EMPLOYEE NO.60198I, R/O RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KUMMARAPU PARAMESWARA RAO, S/O BHEEMARAJU, AGED 37 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER, APSRTC RAZOLE DEPOT, EMPLOYEE NO.601979, R/O RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. KONDEPUDI GANESWARA RAO, S/O NARSIMHA RAO, AGED 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER, APSRTC RAZOLE DEPOT, EMPLOYEE NO.601853, RIO RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. NALLI VISHNU MURTHY, S/O VIVEKANANDAM, AGED 38 YEARS, OCCUPATION: DRIVER, APSRTC RAZOLE DEPOT, R/O RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORT, ROADS & BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, RTC X- ROADS, MUSHEERABAD, HYDERABAD. 3. ANDHRA PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS DEPOT MANAGER, RAZOLE DEPOT, RAZOLE. EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ, one in the nature of a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, declaring the action of the Respondents compelling the Petitioners/Drivers to perform the dual job of Conductor and Driver with TIM Services as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the Service Regulations, violative to the provisions of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and consequently direct the Respondents not to insist the Petitioners to perform the dual job of Drivers and Conductors with TIM Services and allow the Petitioners to perform the duties of Drivers only as per the Judgment of this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No.29625/2011 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 15406 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the Respondents not to compel/entrust the duties of TIM Service Machines to the Petitioners Drivers as per the Judgment of this Hon'ble court in W.P.No.29625/2011 dated 30.01.2012 by entrusting the duties of Drivers only, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WVMP 120798 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. E MADAN MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. K SATYANARAYAN MURTHY(SC FOR APSRTC)
2. GP FOR TRANSPORT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 12247 OF 2014 ORDER: Today, none represented for the petitioner(s). On earlier occasion also, there was no representation for the petitioner(s). Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date: 03.03.2026 BSK
78 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 12247 OF 2014
Date: 03.03.2026 BSK