IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 626/2026 Decided on: 25.08.2026 Priya Atri …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ......Respondents ………………………………………………………………………………… Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Piyush Dhanotia, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Previous order has been complied with by the respondents. Cost imposed therein has been paid to the petitioner by way of demand draft drawn in the name of the petitioner, which has been handed over to his learned counsel. 2. Learned Additional Advocate General has also placed on record a copy of office instructions dated 17.08.2026 from the Director School Education conveying consideration of petitioner’s case under office order dated 17.08.2026. The said office order has also been appended along with the office instructions. 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 3. Taking note of above documents, the present execution petition to stand disposed of. Liberty is, however, reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy, in accordance with law, for the redressal of her surviving grievances, if any. Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 25th August, 2026 (rohit)