Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010263082025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1822/2025 Between:
1. P.S.N REDDY CONSTRUCTIONS, REP. ITS MANAGING PARTER, PADALA SATYANARAYANA REDDY, S/O NAGIREDDY, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O D.NO.70-4A, PADMA NAGAR, RAMANAIAH PETA, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. G SAI PRASAD, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT. MAJOR, AS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES AND IRRIGATION DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARVATHI.
2. P PRASANTHI, D/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT.MAJOR, COLLECTOR, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM.
3. RAMA KRISHNA, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT. MAJOR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GODAVARI
EASTERN DIVISION, RAMACHANDRAPURAM, DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR KONASEEMA DT, (EARLIER EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT
4. G SAI PRASAD, , S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT. MAJOR, COMMISSIONER, COMMAND AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, IRRIGATION BHAVAN, VIJAYAWADA.
5. PIYUSH KUMAR, S/O NOT KNOWN, AGED ABOUT. MAJOR, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPART
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to issue summons made sec 10 to 12, 15 and 16 of Contempt of courts act 1971 to punish the contemnors/ respondents for willful violation order of this Honourable court in WP No. 8475 of 2024 dated 10-05- 2024 and pass such orders as this Honourable Court may deem fit just and proper in the circumstances of the case, and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BOKKA SATYANARAYANA KAMLA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. SUSHMA YAGANTI
2. U KANAKA RAJU
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
ORDER: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
When the matter is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the orders of this Court has been complied with by the respondents. Therefore, no cause survives and no further orders are required to be passed in the present Contempt Case.
Learned counsel for the respondents also accepted the same.
In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents, the present Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
__________________________________
VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J
30.01.2026 M K K
207 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
Contempt Case No.1822 of 2025
Date: 30.01.2026 M K K