1 2026:CGHC:23632 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2851 of 2026 Griham Housing Finance Limited (Formerly Known As Magma Housing Finance Limited And Poonawala Housing Finance Limited) Through Hemant Kusare, S/o Shri Natthuji, Aged About 46 Years Working As Area Legal Manager Having Office At 4th Floor, Girish Heights, Near Lic Square, Kamthi Road, Nagpur Pin - 440001 Maharashtra ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Raipur (Chhattisgarh) 2 - The Tehsildar Tehsil - Pendra Road, District- Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Pin - 495 117 (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Rama Goyal S/o Anil Garg R/o House No. 1163, Amarkantak Road West, No. 5, Village- Gaurela, Tehsil- Pendra, District- Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Pin - 495 117 (Chhattisgarh) 4 - Mesurs Goyal Telicom R/o House No. 1163, Amarkantak Road West, No. 5, Village- Gaurela, Tehsil- Pendra, District- Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Pin - 495 117 (Chhattisgarh) 5 - Bhateri Bai Goyal W/o Murari Lal Agrawal R/o House No. 1163, Amarkantak Road West, No. 5, Village- Gaurela, Tehsil- Pendra, District- Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Pin - 495 117 (Chhattisgarh) 6 - Siyaram Goyal S/o Prabhu Dayal Goyal R/o House No. 1163, Amarkantak Road West, No. 5, Village- Gaurela, Tehsil- Pendra, District- Gaurela-Pendra- Marwahi Pin - 495 117 (Chhattisgarh) 7 - Praveen Kumar Goyal S/o Siyaram Goyal R/o House No. 1163, Amarkantak Road West, No. 5, Village- Gaurela, Tehsil- Pendra, District- Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi Pin - 495 117 (Chhattisgarh) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2026.06.11 16:47:23 +0530 2 For Petitioner : Mr. Ritesh Sharma, Advocate (through Video Conferencing) For State/Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr. Vinay Pandey, Deputy Advocate General Hon’ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board 11.06.2026 1 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now the Debt Recovery Tribunal is become functioning and as such, he may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach before the Debt Recovery Tribunal for redressal of his grievance. 2 The aforesaid submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by the learned counsel appearing for the State- respondents. 3 On due consideration the submission advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 4 In view of the above, I.A. No.01, an application for urgent hearing and I.A. No.02, an application for hearing the case during summer vacation, stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Yogesh