Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21074 (CHH)

TOSHRAM CHOUDHARY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/2816/2026 · 2026-06-08

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 / 2 2026:CGHC:23608 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2816 of 2026 1 - Toshram Choudhary S/o Shri Nilkanth Nirmalkar Aged About 48 Years Occupation - Fad Prabhari Aadim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Jalaki Registration No. 1167 Paddy Procurement Center - Jalaki R/o Village - Ward No.5 Jalaki Thana Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) 2 - Babulal Patel S/o Shri Gajadhar Patel Aged About 49 Years Occupation- Fad Prabhari Aadim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Jalaki, Registration No. 1167, Paddy Procurement Center - Achanakpur R/o Village- Achanakpur Ward No.1 Bandora Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Co-Operative Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, C.G. 3 - District Co-Operative Markfed Officer Mahasamund District Mahasamund, C.G. 4 - Deputy Commissioner /Deputy Registrar Co-Operative Society Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, C.G. 5 - Branch Manager Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit Raipur Branch Sirpur, District Mahasamund, C.G. 6 – Aadim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Jalaki Registration No. 1167, Through Its Prescribed Officer, Aadim Jati Sewa Sahakari Samiti Maryadit Jalaki, Tahsil And District- Mahasamund (C.G.) ... Respondents ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2026.06.09 14:40:31 +0530 2 / 2 For Petitioners : Mr. Sumit Shrivastava, Advocate appears through Video Conferencing For State /Respondents No.1 &2 : Mr. Atanu Ghosh, Dy. GA For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Mr. Shaleen Singh Baghel, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas) Order on Board 09/06/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to take recourse of law available to them. 2. Not opposed by the Respondent counsel. 3. Prayer is allowed. 4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid. SD/- SD/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) JUDGE ashu