[2026:RJ-JP:3622] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16990/2025 Praveen Gurjar S/o Shri Ajaypal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Malakheda Gate Opposite Old Post Office, Near Chaju Singh Ki Gali, District Alwar (Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anil Kumar Jain For Complainant(s) For State : : Mr. Sunil Khanna Mr. Amit Kumar Gupta, Addl.G.A. cum P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 27/01/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.297/2025 registered with the Police Station, Aravali Vihar, District Alwar for offence under Sections 351(2), 352 and 331(6) of B.N.S., 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the complainant has given an affidavit that name of the present accused-petitioner has wrongly been arrayed as an accused and he has no objection if the accused-petitioner is given the benefit of anticipatory bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the anticipatory bail application. [2026:RJ-JP:3622] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16990/2025] 4. Learned counsel for the complainant states that the complainant has given the affidavit in favour of the accused- petitioner for extending the benefit of anticipatory bail to him. 5. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the accused-petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor as well as the learned counsel for the complainant and also perused the contents of the affidavit, which is said to have been given by the complainant and same has been placed on record as Annexure-3. 6. The allegation against the present accused-petitioner is that he entered into the shop of the complainant and threw the articles outside the shop. Further allegations against the accused- petitioner is that he also misbehaved with the minor girl of the complainant, who was at the shop and also gave threatening to set the shop on fire. It is also alleged that two days ago also, the accused-petitioner threatened his daughter for sending the messages. 7. On perusal of the rejection order passed by the learned Court Below, it is revealed that there are as many as fifteen other criminal cases registered against the accused-petitioner. 8. Considering the allegations levelled against the accused-petitioner and his criminal background, the affidavit placed before this Court by the complainant in favour of the petitioner, seems to be an act of the petitioner of tempering the witnesses, hence, this Court, in view of the aforesaid facts, is not inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail. [2026:RJ-JP:3622] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16990/2025] 9. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application filed by the accused-petitioner is dismissed. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /263