[2026:RJ-JP:2638] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26543/2018 1. Sunil Kumar S/o Sitaram Chandelia, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Bagad, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 2. Rakesh Kumar S/o Kanta Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Bagad, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 3. Kailash S/o Shyam Lal, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 4. Gopiram S/o Santosh Kumar, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 5. Shravan Kumar S/o Madan Lal, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Shiv Colony, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 6. Bharat Kumar S/o Babu Lal, Aged About 39 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 7. Krishan Kumar S/o Suresh Kumar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 8. Ganesh S/o Tilu Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 9. Gajanand S/o Ramesh Kumar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 10. Vijay Kumar S/o Banwari Lal, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 11. Ganesh S/o Mahaveer Prasad, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 12. Sunder Lal S/o Kashi Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 13. Sumitra W/o Kanuram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Ward No. 23, Baba Hariram Colony, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 14. Simi Devi W/o Mukesh Kumar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 15. Tulsi Devi W/o Jagdish Prasad, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 16. Santosh Devi W/o Ganesh, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 17. Aachi Devi W/o Chote Lal, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 18. Narendra Dulgach S/o Kishan Lal, Aged About 32 Years, [2026:RJ-JP:2638] (2 of 4) [CW-26543/2018] R/o Ward No. 20, Bapu Basti, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 19. Pushpa Devi W/o Pushkar Lal, Aged About 41 Years, R/o Ward No. 14, Bagad, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Additional Chief Secretary / Principal Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department (Udh), Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Director Cum Joint Secretary, Directorate Of Local Self Bodies, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Civil Lines Phatak, Jaipur. 3. The Municipal Council, Jhunjhunu Through Its Commissioner. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Raghav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Surya Pratap Singh Rajawat for Mr. G.S. Gill, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/01/2026 1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer: “The respondents may kindly be directed to allow appointment to the petitioners on the post of Sweeper/Safai Karmchari at M.C. Jhunjhunu to advertisement No.1/2018 dated 13.04.2018 against 23 vacant posts in context of Information dated 14.09.2018 forwarded by the respondent no. 3 to the Vice Chairman, State Safai Karmchari Commission, Govt. of Rajasthan, Jaipur with all consequential service benefits. ii) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances [2026:RJ-JP:2638] (3 of 4) [CW-26543/2018] of the case also be passed in favour of humble petitioner along with cost of writ petition.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon order dated 20.08.2019 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13555/2019 titled as Bharat and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court (on the basis of ratio laid down in case of Priyanka Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. : SB Civil Writ Petition No.17470/2018). He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order. 3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed in light of Bharat and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors (supra) and Priyanka Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case of Bharat and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors (supra) and Priyanka Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), but in case of deviation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the [2026:RJ-JP:2638] (4 of 4) [CW-26543/2018] petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. Needless to say that if ratio is applicable upon facts of the case as claimed by the petitioners, then same benefits be extended. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/91