Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21067 (AP)

P V RAMI REDDY v. Sri Kumar Vishwajeet

CC/932/2020 · 2026-03-01

R Raghunandan Rao, T C D Sekhar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010258392020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3529] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 932/2020 Between: 1. P V RAMI REDDY, S/O.LATE POLI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC ASI 270, PRESENTLY WORKING AS ASI, ALLAGADDA RURAL P.S., R/O.ALLAGADDA, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI KUMAR VISHWAJEET, IPS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC PRINCIPAL SECRETARY - HOME DEPARTMENT, A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2. SRI DAMODAR GOUTAM SAWANG, IPS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. SRI P VENKAT RAMI REDDY, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC DY.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KURNOOL RANGE, KURNOOL. 4. SRI K PAKIRAPPA, IPS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OM SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 5. SRI HARISH KUMAR GUPTA IPS, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC-DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. SRI DR KOYA PRAVEEN IPS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR,OCC-DY.INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KURNOOL RANGE, KURNOOL. 7. SRI VIKRANT PATIL IPS, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC-SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. RR 5 TO 7 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 30.12.2025, VIDE IA NO-1/25 IN CC NO-932 OF 2020. ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the Respondents herein for willfully, deliberately and intentionally violating and flouting the common Orders of this Hon'ble High Court's dated 24.2.2020 in WP No.27734/2017 and batch and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant special leave to implead the Respondents 5 to 7 /proposed Respondents herein as Respondent Nos.5 to 7 in the above contempt case No.932/2020 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P RAMABHOOPAL REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. G RAJU 2. GP FOR SERVICES I (AP) 3. The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the orders of the Court have been complied with. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO, J ________________ T.C.D. SEKHAR, J Date: 02.03.2026 MJA 228 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 932/2020 (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) 02.03.2026 MJA