Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21064 (KAR)

G MAHESH KUMAR @ MAHESH KUMAR GUIDYADOLU v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/877/2026 · 2026-06-15

H P Sandesh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28968 CRL.RP No. 877 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.877 OF 2026 BETWEEN: 1. G. MAHESH KUMAR @ MAHESH KUMAR GUIDYADOLU, S/O RAGHURAMA NAIDU, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, R/AT 495/2, 5TH MAIN ROAD, 3RD ‘B’ CROSS, BSNK 2ND BLOCK, 3RD STAGE, KANTHNAGUPPE WATER TANK MAIN ROAD, HOSAKAREHALLI, BENGALURU SOUTH. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VINAYAK V. KULKARNI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR, KOLAR RURAL POLICE STATION, KOLAR, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU-560001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. DIVAKAR MADDUR, HCGP) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 R/W 401 OF CR.PC (FILED U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 09.09.2025 PASSED IN CR.R.P. NO.46/2025 BY THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28968 CRL.RP No. 877 of 2026 KOLAR, AND THE ORDER DATED 13.06.2025 PASSED IN CR.NO.230/2025 BY THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR, INSOFAR AS THEY IMPOSE A CONDITION TO FURNISH BANK GUARANTEE OF RS.20,00,000/- FOR RELEASE OF VEHICLE BEARING NO.KA-05-MP-7899; MODIFY THE SAID ORDERS BY DIRECTING RELEASE OF THE PETITIONERS VEHICLE NO.KA-05-MP-7899 IN HIS INTERIM CUSTODY ON SUCH REASONABLE AND PROPORTIONATE SECURITY AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT, COMMENSURATE WITH THE APPROXIMATE MARKET VALUE OF THE VEHICLE AND SUBJECT TO USUAL CONDITIONS REGARDING PRODUCTION OF THE VEHICLE AS AND WHEN REQUIRED. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER This matter is listed to make submission with regard to the maintainability of the criminal revision petition. This Court having noticed that the learned counsel for the revision petitioner was absent in the previous date of hearing i.e., on 08.06.2026, directed the learned High Court Government Pleader to take notice for the respondent and also directed the learned counsel for the revision petitioner to serve a copy of the revision petition forthwith on the learned HCGP and the same is not furnished. Even direction was given to the learned counsel for the revision petitioner to comply with the office - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28968 CRL.RP No. 877 of 2026 objections within one week and also to make submission regarding maintainability on the next date of hearing. 2. Today this matter is called twice both in the morning session and also in the afternoon session and there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner and hence, it is clear that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the matter and also not diligent. Hence, the revision petition is dismissed. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE MD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 10