- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28561 CRL.RP No. 128 of 2021 C/W CRL.RP No. 127 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.128 OF 2021 C/W CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.127 OF 2021 IN CRL.RP NO.128/2021 BETWEEN: SRI PRADEEP KUMAR C N S/O LATE NAJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS R/AT NO.90/1, 1-25 10TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN B M K LAYOUT, VITTAL NAGAR BENGALURU-560 026 …PETITIONER (BY SRI BHARATH B YADAV, ADVOCATE) AND: VIRCHAKRA CHITS (P)LTD., REGD. OFFICE AT NO.64 FIRST FLOOR, MARUTHI PLAZA D V G ROAD, BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE-560 004, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR (KAVYANKA.H.S.) …RESPONDENT (BY SRI SRINIVAS R, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by DEVIKA M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28561 CRL.RP No. 128 of 2021 C/W CRL.RP No. 127 of 2021 THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 29.01.2019 PASSED BY THE XIX ADDITIONAL JUDGE, COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND XLI A.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.20350/2011 AND ETC. IN CRL.RP NO.127/2021 BETWEEN: SRI. RAJENDRA PRASAD C N S/O LATE NANJUNDAIAH AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS R/AT NO.90/1, 1-25 10TH CROSS, 2ND MAIN B.M.K. LAYOUT VITTAL NAGAR BENGALURU-560 026 ...PETITIONER (BY SRI BHARATH B YADAV, ADVOCATE) AND: VIRCHAKRA CHITS (P) LTD., REGD. OFFICE AT NO.64 FIRST FLOOR, MARUTHI PLAZA D.V.G. ROAD BASAVANAGUDI BANGALORE-560 004 REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR ...RESPONDENT (BY SRI SRINIVAS R, ADVOCATE) THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W 401 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT DATED 29.01.2019 PASSED BY THE XIX ADDITIONAL JUDGE COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND XLI A.C.M.M., BENGALURU IN C.C.NO.20349/2011 AND ETC. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28561 CRL.RP No. 128 of 2021 C/W CRL.RP No. 127 of 2021 THESE PETITIONS, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH ORAL ORDER The counsel for the petitioner in Crl.R.P.No.128/2021 has filed I.A.No.2/2026 for bail and I.A.No.3/2026 for condonation of delay in complying the conditional order dated 08.02.2021. 2. I.A.No.3/2026 is filed after lapse of 5 years since the conditional order was passed in the year 2021. This Court having taken note of the fact that the petitioner has not complied the conditional order passed by this Court, non- bailable warrant was issued. Now, the counsel has filed an application for recalling the NBW also. 3. Having taken note of the factual aspects of the case that the conditional order was passed in the year 2021 and after 5 years, the application is filed to comply the said order and this Court do not find any grounds to entertain these applications since the revision petition is of the year 2021. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.2/2026 and 4/2026 are rejected. - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:28561 CRL.RP No. 128 of 2021 C/W CRL.RP No. 127 of 2021 4. In Crl.R.P.No.127/2021 also, the petitioner has failed to comply with the conditional order passed by this Court in the year 2021. Hence, the revisions petitions are dismissed as no further consideration of the matter is required in view of non-compliance of the conditional order of this Court and the revision petitions are also not yet admitted. Sd/- (H.P.SANDESH) JUDGE SN