[2026:RJ-JP:2355] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 767/2026 1. Smt. Koyli, W/o Late Baldev 2. Manni @ Manudi, D/o Late Baldev 3. Kishni, W/o Late Ganesh 4. Pradhan, S/o Late Ganesh 5. Chuka, D/o Late Ganesh 6. Niraj, D/o Late Ganesh 7. Roshni D/o Late Ganesh, All Are R/o Village Ghughra, Tehsil And District Ajmer. ----Petitioners Versus 1. Shri Yudhistar Bulani S/o Shri Jhammatmal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Diggi Choke, Ajmer (Since Deceased) Through His Legal Representatives 1/1. Smt. Lata Bulani W/o Late Shi Yudhistar Bulani, Aged About 66 Years, R/o 735/55, Chankyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. 1/2. Kapil Bulani S/o Late Shi Yudhistar Bulani, Aged About 39 Years, R/o 735/55, Chankyapuri Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer. 2. Hemraj S/o Late Baldev (Since Deceased), Through His Legal Representatives- 2/1. Smt. Santosh, W/o Late Hemraj 2/2. Kumari Sarita D/o Late Hemraj, Through Legal Guardian Mother Santosh Devi, 2/3. Kumari Shalu D/o Late Hemraj, Through Legal Guardian Mother Santosh Devi 2/4. Rajveer S/o Late Hemraj, Through Legal Guardian Mother Santosh Devi 2/5. Kumari Madhu, D/o Late Hemraj Through Legal Guardian Mother Santosh Devi 3. Kishna, W/o Sharvan 4. Kailash, S/o Sharvan 5. Harnath, S/o Sharvan 6. Dayal, S/o Sharvan 7. Santosh, D/o Sharvan 8. Geeta D/o Sharvan, All Are R/o Village Ghughra, Tehsil And District Ajmer ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gajendra Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) : [2026:RJ-JP:2355] (2 of 2) [CW-767/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Judgment / Order 20/01/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, on his application, the agreement dated 16.04.2008, having been found insufficiently stamped, has not been sent to the Concerned Authority for proper stamping and has only been impounded by the learned Trial Court. 2. He apprehends that the document might be permitted to be exhibited during evidence without proper stamping. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the material available on record. 4. The apprehension shown by the learned counsel for the petitioners is baseless as until and unless the document is properly stamped, the same is inadmissible in evidence under the Rajasthan Stamps Act, 1998. 5. Moreover, if the document has been impounded by the learned Trial Court, no exhibition in evidence is permissible until the document is properly stamped. 6. With the above observations, the present Civil Writ Petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J MAHIMA/18