[2026:RJ-JP:684] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 26372/2018 Shyam Singh S/o Shri Girraj Singh, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Village Mahatoli Post Chentoli Tehsil Bhusawar District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Addl. Chief Secretary To Government, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur 2. The Inspector-General Of Police (Headquarters), Police Headquarters, Lal Kothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 3. The Superintendent Of Police, District Bharatpur, Bharatpur (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Pushpendra Pal Singh with Mr. Niranjan Singh Raghav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/01/2026 1. Instant petition is preferred with following prayer: "(i) By an appropriate writ order or direction it be declared that preventing the petitioner from being appointed on the post of Constable-General in Bharatpur District under MBC quota is unjust, improper, arbitrary, violative of Article 14, 16 & 21 of the Constitution of India and be ordered to be quashed and set aside. (ii) By an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof the respondents may kindly be directed to appoint humble petitioner on the post of Constable (General) under MBC [2026:RJ-JP:684] (2 of 3) [CW-26372/2018] quota under respondent No. 3 with effect the date other candidates have been appointed with all consequential benefits." 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that in pursuance to advertisement dated 25.05.2018 for recruitment on the post of constable in the year 2018, the petitioner has filed an application and ultimately he was called for PST, PET. He also submitted that after the recruitment process, it was informed that petitioner has secured 39.375 marks in MBC category, but he was not given appointment. He also submitted that the petitioner is entitled for appointment, but the same was not granted. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the material placed on record. 4. The facts as narrated by the petitioner indicate that pursuant to advertisement dated 25.05.2018 for the post of Constable for the year 2018, the petitioner applied for the post of Constable (General) in the concerned TSP area under MBC category. The petitioner has claimed 16.25 marks in Part A, 6.875 marks in Part B, and 16.25 marks in Part C, totaling 39.375 marks. The petitioner appeared for PST/PET on 13.09.2018. The written examination cut-off in Bharatpur District for the MBC category is 33.125. 5. As per Annexure-5, vide letter dated 13.10.2018, the petitioner was informed that the process of recruitment is continuing and the information sought by the petitioner can only be provided after completion of the selection process. The petitioner has failed to show any ground, why he was [2026:RJ-JP:684] (3 of 3) [CW-26372/2018] not considered. The petitioner has not been able to establish any case of discrimination against the respondents, therefore, no case is made out for interference and issuance of writ under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 6. Accordingly, the writ petition, along with the miscellaneous application, if any, stands dismissed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /20