[2026:RJ-JP:369] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16900/2025 Rajesh S/o Shri Kaluram, R/o Village Todi, Police Station Manoharpur, District Jaipur, (Raj.) (At Present Petitioner Confined At District Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17031/2025 Jagdish Prasad Thori S/o Sh. Kajod Mal Thori, R/o Ward No. 16, Sitarampura, Police Station Khatushyamji District Sikar. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17032/2025 Rohit Saini S/o Shri Prakash Chand Saini, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Mali Ki Dhani, Shivpuri, Gram Manoharpur, Tehsil Shahpura, District Jaipur (Rajasthan) (At Present In Sub Jail Kotputli). ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. K.K. Bhinda Mr. Manjeet Kumar Mr. Om Prakash Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA [2026:RJ-JP:369] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16900/2025] Order 07/01/2026 1. Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S., arising out of F.I.R. No.0357/2025 registered with the Police Station Shahpura (Jaipur Rural), District Jaipur (Rural) for offence under Sections 189(2), 140(1), 309(4), 115(2), 127(2) & 111(2)(b) of B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 3 & 25(6) of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsels for the petitioners submit that the accused-petitioners have not been named in the First Information Report and they are in custody for last about one month. Learned counsel also submits that no test identification parade of the accused petitioners has been conducted so as to get identified by the complainant, whether they were involved in committing the offence or not. He further submits that there is only one grievous injury which is said to have been sustained by one of the injured witnesses. He also submits that trial will take long time to conclude, therefore the accused-petitioners may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made by counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners and so also the fact that the petitioners have not been named in the F.I.R. and no test identification [2026:RJ-JP:369] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16900/2025] parade has been conducted and they are in custody for last about one month, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these bail applications are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter be transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected bail applications. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /215-217