SRI. T.M. MUNIKRISHNAIAH v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/1833/2026 · 2026-06-09
Ashok S Kinagi
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21051 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21051 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27657 WP No. 1833 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI WRIT PETITION NO. 1833 OF 2026 (S-REG) BETWEEN:
1. SRI.T.M.MUNIKRISHNAIAH, S/O LATE MUNITHIMMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS,
2. SRI.GOVI, S/O DASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
BOTH PETITIONERS ARE WORKING AS A DRE/CASUAL LABOURER IN FISHERIES RESEARCH INFORMATION CENTRE, (I.E. FRIC), HEBBAL, BENGALURU – 560 094. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. R. RAMACHANDRAIAH., ADVOCATE) AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENTAL OF ANIMAL HUSBANDRY AND FISHERIES, VIKASAS SOUDHA, BENGALURU – 560 001.
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY.
Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location:
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27657 WP No. 1833 of 2026
2.
THE VICE CHANCELLOR, THE KARNATAKA VETERNARY ANIMAL AND FISHERIES SCIENCES UNIVERSITY, PB NO.6, NANDINAGAR, BIDAR – 585 401.
REP. BY ITS REGISTRAR.
3.
PRINCIPAL AND HOD, FISHERIES RESEARCH INFORMATION CENTRE, (I.E. F.R.I.C.), HEBBAL, BENGALURU – 560 094. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.G.RAMESH NAIK, AGA FOR R1;
SMT.VAISHALI HEGDE, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3)
THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS, DIRECTION THE RESPONDENT NO.2 CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 05/01/2026 MADE BY THE PETITIONERS VIDE ANNEXURES-G AND H, TO REGULARIZE THEIR SERVICES IN PERMANENT NATURE WITH ALL CONSEQUENTIAL BENEFITS, I.E. PENSION, SALARY, GRATUITY, ARREARS OF SALARY IF ANY AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27657 WP No. 1833 of 2026
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
ORAL ORDER
The petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking for a mandamus directing respondent No.2 to consider the representations vide Annexures G and H dated 05.01.2026 requesting the respondent to regularize their services in permanent nature with all consequential benefits.
2.
Brief facts leading rise to the filing of these writ petition are as follows: The petitioners have joined the services as DRE working in respondent authorities for more than 37 years and 39 years respectively, and respondent No.2 has issued a notification dated 12.09.2014 wherein the petitioners are eligible, as such, they have submitted a representation before the respondent to consider their services as permanent in nature. The respondent has not considered the representations vide Annexures G and H. Hence, this writ petition.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:27657 WP No. 1833 of 2026
3.
Learned counsel appearing for respondent No.2 submits that, if reasonable time is granted, respondent No.2 would consider the representations vide Annexures G and H and pass an appropriate order in accordance with law.
4. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for respondent No.2, the writ petition is disposed of, directing respondent No.2 to consider the representations vide Annexures G and H and pass an appropriate orders in accordance with law within a period of one month from the date of receipt of the copy of this
order.
5. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed off accordingly.
Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE SSB