Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21050 (AP)

BHAVANA UDAYA BHASKARA RAO v. SRI AKULA MOHANA RADHIKA

CRP/1306/2025 · 2026-03-08

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010266132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] MONDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1306/2025 Between: 1. BHAVANA UDAYA BHASKARA RAO, S/O. RAMACHANDRA RAO, HINDU, AGE. 48 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. MUDUNURU, PENTAPADU MANDAL. AND ALSO AT R/O. FLAT NO 201, BHAPAL ENCLAVE, BHUPAL NAGAR, TEDEPALLIGUDEM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SRI AKULA MOHANA RADHIKA, W/o. Dhanasekhar, Hindu, Age, 45 years, Occ. Advocate, 15th ward, Savitrupeta, Tadepalligudem, West Godavari District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to begs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of Civil Procedure Code against the order and decree dated. 21.04.2025passed inEP.No.57/2023inOS.No.ll6/2017 on the file of the Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Tadepalligudem IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings EP No. 57/2023 in OS No. 2 116/2017 on the file of Hon’ble Civil Judge (Senior Division) at Tadepalligudem pending disposal of the revision petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following: ORDER: Sri Akula Vamsi Krishna, learned counsel representing Sri K.Sai Sri Harsha, learned counsel for the petitioner, reported that the E.P. itself has been disposed of and that the present civil revision petition has become infructuous. 2. Registry has also placed on record the case information status, which indicates that on 14.10.2025 the E.P was disposed uncontested. 3. In view of the above, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 09th March, 2026 RKS