[2026:RJ-JP:4527] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 17021/2025 Sahil S/o Bajrang Lal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Digrota, Police Station Satnali, District Mahendragarh, Haryana. Presently Reside At As A Tenant At Bagas Road, Near Water Tank, Police Station Bagru, District Jaipur West. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Choudhary, Mr. Yatin Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP, Ms. Manju Dave, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 31/01/2026 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No. 1104/2025 registered at Police Station Muhana, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 140(3) and 307 of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the petitioner was not involved in the alleged crime. It is contended that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 08.11.2025 and trial of the case may take considerable time, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner, [2026:RJ-JP:4527] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-17021/2025] therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the petitioner along with the other co-accused after abducting the victim Vikas, kept him in illegal custody and victim was recovered later on upon the information furnished by the independent witnesses. It was also revealed that the petitioner was driving the Scorpio vehicle and in the course of investigation, victim has identified the petitioner as one of the culprit, thus, the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime is apparent, therefore, considering the aforesaid facts, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact narrated in the factual report, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application of the accused-petitioner is hereby dismissed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/6