APHC010253162023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13390/2023 Between: 1. J SAROJA, W/O J.CHINNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2. SRI J.THIRUPATHAMMA, W/O J.VENKATARATHNAM, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 3. SMT. D.OBULAMMA, W/O D.RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. SMT. S.MABUBI, W/O S.RAHAMTHULLA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 5. SMT. S.AMEENA BEGUM, W/O AKBAR, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC. COCLIE, RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 2 6. SMT. V.SUNDARAMMA, W/O V.OBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 7. SMT. D.MADHAVILATHA, W/O D.SREERAMULU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 8. SMT. D.RANI, W/O D.SREENIVASULU, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC. COOLIE, RESIDENT OF MAMILLAPALLI VILLAGE, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT AT KADAPA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, C.K.DINNE MANDAL, YSR KADAPA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue Writ, or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners House Plots vide his proceeding Ref.No.1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 13/2008, dated 31-03- 3 2008 respectively for an extent of 0.02 cents each with the specific boundaries, situated in Sy.Nos.39 of Mamillapalli village, C.K.Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violation of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners House Plots and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners House Plots vide his proceeding Ref.No.1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 13/2008, dated 31-03-2008 respectively an extent of 0.02 cents each with the specific boundaries, situated in Sy.Nos.39 of Mamillapalli village, C.K.Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law, pending disposal of the Writ petition before this Honourable court, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be pleased to. grant leave to Respondent No.4 to file counter affidavit in the above Writ Petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VUTUPALLI RAJANNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13390/2023 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “….to issue Writ or Direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners House Plots vide his proceeding Ref No.1, 2, 3, 6, 8, 9, 11 and 13/2008 dated 31.03.2008 and 31.03.2008 respectively for an extent of 0.02 cents each with the specific boundaries situated in Sy.No.39 of Mamillapalli village C.K. Dinne Mandal, YSR Kadapa District without following due process of law is illegal, arbitrary, highhanded and violation of Article 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioners House Plots and pass” 2. Precisely, the writ petition is filed questioning the action of the 4th respondent-Tahsildar in trying to occupy the properties and trying to cancel the house site pattas, which were granted in favour of petitioner in the year 2008, and thereby demanding to surrender the pattas to the 4th respondent. 3. The 4th respondent-Tahsildar has filed counter affidavit and denied the said allegations, stating that neither the 4th respondent nor his staff ever visited the alleged house sites with an intention to threaten the petitioners, direct them to vacate or to demolish any foundations. 5 4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. However, if the respondents intend to take any action against the subject property of the writ petition, the 4th respondent shall follow the procedure contemplated under law. No costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 10.03.2026 ANS 6 123 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 13390/2023 Date: 10.03.2026 ANS