[2026:RJ-JP:655] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20438/2025 Prahlad Son Of Mangla, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Dhani Purjiwavli, Tan Gram Deerwala, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Ramkishor Son Of Surajmal, 2. Tijadevi Wife Of Surajmal, All Residents Of Village Deerwala, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar. ----Respondents 3. Krishan Son Of Chauthu, 4. Ramjilal Son Of Chauthu, 5. Ramniwas Son Of Chauthu, 6. Kalu Ram Son Of Gyarsa, 7. Harsahay Son Of Gangu, 8. Narvada Wife Of Bhuraram, 9. Maligram Son Of Shyamalal, All Residents Of Dhani Purjiwavli, Tan Gram Deerwala, Tehsil Shrimadhopur, District Sikar. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Dharmendra Choudhary For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 08/01/2026 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the following prayers:- i) By an appropriate writ, order and direction in the nature thereof the impugned order dated 09.12.2025 passed by the board of revenue ajmer in revision ta no.5480/2023 district sikar titled as prahlad versus ramkishor and others and the order dated 14.09.2023 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, [2026:RJ-JP:655] (2 of 2) [CW-20438/2025] Srimadhopur may kindly be quashed and set aside and appropriate direction may kindly be passed. ii) Any other order or direction as may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be passed in favour of humble petitioner. 2. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if the learned Revenue Appellate Authority, Sikar is directed to decide the pending appeal No.65/2025 and the stay application expeditiously, preferably, within a time-bound manner. 3. Heard and considered the submissions so advanced and also perused the material available on record. 4. Looking to the controversy involved in the present appeal and the issue involved is with regard to disputed way the learned Revenue Appellate Authority, Sikar is directed to dispose of the appeal No.65/2025 and the stay application titled as 'Krishan & Ors. vs. Ramkishor & Ors.' expeditiously, within a period of one month from the date of receiving the certified copy of this Order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. 6. Any other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J SOURAV /60