MUPPANA RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD RAO v. DR P SAMPATH KUMAR IRS
CC/3691/2024 · 2026-03-04
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21036 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 21036 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010258262024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] THURSDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3691/2024 Between:
1. MUPPANA RAMA KRISHNA PRASAD RAO, S/O. M.VENKATA RAO, D.NO. 48-19-5, M.V.R.COMPLEX, OPP TO RTC COMPLEX, SRINAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM. 530016.
...PETITIONER AND
1. DR P SAMPATH KUMAR IRS, THE COMMISSIONER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TENNETI BHAVAN, VISAKHAPATNAM. PIN- 530003
2. DHANJAYA REDDY, THE CHIEF CITY PLANNER GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION TENNETI BHAVAN, VISAKHAPATNAM. PIN- 530003
3. SRI KETAN GARG, THE COMMISSIONER, GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM.
R 3 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTO AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 14.11.2025 IN CC NO-3691 OF 2024
4. SRI M N HARENDHIRA PRASAD, DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VISAKHAPATNAM. R 4 IS IMPLEADED AS SUO MOTO AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 22/01/26, IN CC NO-3691 OF 2024
...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondent contemnor for his will full p. 2 disobedience of Orde Dated 03.01.2024, in WP No. 30163 of 2023 on the file of this Honble Court and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. M RADHAKRISHNA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP)
2. J DILEEP KUMAR The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
The above contempt case was filed complaining of a violation of the order dated 03.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.30163 of 2023.
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the order dated 03.01.2024 passed in W.P.No.30163 of 2023 has been complied with and no further adjudication is required in the contempt case.
3. Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the Contempt Case is dismissed. No order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 05.03.2026 TVN p. 3 42 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CONTEMPT CASE No.3691 OF 2024
Date: 05.03.2026 TVN