Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 2103 (CHH)

LOKNATH PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/22/2026 · 2026-01-06

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:1000 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 22 of 2026 1. Loknath Patel S/o Shri Neelkanth Patel Aged About 47 Years R/o Santoshi Ward, Vrindavan Basti, Kumharpara, Jagdalpur, Tehsil Jagdalpur, Distt. Bastar, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2. Commissioner Raipur Division, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3. Collector Balodabazar Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 4. Sub Divisional Officer (R) Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. 5. Tahsildar Bhatapara, Distt. Balodabazar- Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner : Mr. Manuraj Singh, Advocate For State : Mr. Vivek Verma, Government Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 07.01.2026 1. The petitioner has filed this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India against the order dated 20.08.2025 passed by the Tehsildar Bhatapara by which the petitioner’s application for MANISH YADAV Digitally signed by MANISH YADAV Date: 2026.01.08 17:46:01 +0530 2 mutation of the land in dispute has been rejected. 2. It has been informed by the learned State counsel that there was a loan against the property owned by the petitioner and now that land has been cleared and there is no other impediment in registration of the property. Now the said issue has already been redressed, therefore, there will be no difficulty for the Tahsildar to continue with the proceedings. 3. In view of the statement made by the learned State counsel, since the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed, nothing is required to be adjudicated at this juncture. 4. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Manish