CRWP-6424 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 142 SANDEEP SINGH STATE OF CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: SURYA PARTA directions to the respondent 2. the petitione P-3) before directions to representation within 3. 6424-2026 (O&M) 8587 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH SANDEEP SINGH & ANR. VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB & ORS. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA Mr. Amitoj Singh, Advocate for PARTAP SINGH, J (ORAL) The instant petition has been filed by the directions to the respondents No.2 & 3 to the respondents No.4 and 5. The learned counsel representing the petitioner the petitioners have filed the representation ) before the respondents No.2 and 3 directions to the respondent No.2 representation within the stipulated time. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-6424-2026 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 29.05.2026 .....PETITIONER VERSUS .....RESPONDENT SURYA PARTAP SINGH Advocate for the petitioners. as been filed by the petitioners to protect their life and liberty from sel representing the petitioners submits that representation dated 25.05.2026 (Annexure and 3. The learned counsel prays for to decide the abovementioned to respondents No.1 to 3. (O&M) 2026 .....PETITIONERS .....RESPONDENTS for from submits that (Annexure earned counsel prays for to decide the abovementioned GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-6424 upon the State 5. hereby disposed of representation of the petitioner within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners sha security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relations authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Gaurav Thakur Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 6424-2026 (O&M) 8587 2 upon the State is hereby dispensed with. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners sha security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relations authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of their relationship. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. :Yes/No : Yes/No Hence service of notice Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the ) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. It ll be provided requisite safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is however clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat hip. The police authority of concerned District shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on GAURAV THAKUR 2026.05.29 19:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document