Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 21029 (AP)

Lade Mohana Rao v. Sakalabaktula Sadasiva Rao

CRP/750/2021 · 2026-03-01

Harinath N

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010247532021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] MONDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 750/2021 Between: 1. LADE MOHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 8-6-107, MAIN ROAD, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. LADE SASHIBUSHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 11-260, KODRA STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. LADE JANARDHANA RAO,, S/O LATE RAMALINGESWARA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 11-197, KACHERI STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. LADE VENKATA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 2-56, MAIN ROAD, KOTTAPALLI VILLAGE, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. LADE NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 53 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 3-107, OLD NH-5 ROAD, OPP. R.T.C. COMPLEX, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. LADE TIRUMALA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 48 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 11-217, MAIN ROAD, OPP. POST OFFICE, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2 7. LADE SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-29A, KACHERI STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. LADE NARASIMHA MURTHY,, S/O LATE SATYANARAYNA, (DIED) AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 5- 13/14-132, VISAKHA B'' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 9. BOYINA BABU RAO,, S/O PEDASOMULU, AGED 84 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 12-251, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. LADE SARAD,, W/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 67 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. HOUSE HOLD DUTIES, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14- 132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 11. LADE RAVI KUMAR, , S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 12. LADE VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 41 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. (PETITIONERS 10 TO 12 WERE ADDED AS LR'S OF DECEASED PETITIONER NO -8 VIDE I.A. NO. 145 OF 2020 DT. 23- 12-2020) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SAKALABAKTULA SADASIVA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SAKALABAKTULA RAMA KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 68 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 4-3-60A, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3 3. SAKALABAKTULA SANKARA NARAYANA, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 66 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, RIO D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. SAKALABAKTULA CHANDRABUSHANA GUPTA, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 64 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10- 1-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SAKALABAKTULA PADMAVATHI, W/O LATE NAGARAJU, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-150, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SAKALABAKTULA HARIHARA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O PLOT NO. 202, BLARAJI RESIDENCY, NEHRU ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 7. SAKALABAKTULA VENKATA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-157, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. MENDA TRINADHA RAO, S/O LATE ADINARAYANA, AGED 36 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS R/O JONNALAPADU VILLAGE, KOTABOMMALI R.S. POST SANTABOMMALI MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. SAKALABHAKTULA KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. SAKALABHAKTULA ANIL KUMAR, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O H.NO.10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 11. SAKALABHAKTULA SUNEEL, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 4 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: 5 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 751/2021 Between: 1. LADE MOHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 8-6-107, MAIN ROAD, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. LADE SASHIBUSHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 11-260, KODRA STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. LADE JANARDHANA RAO,, S/O LATE RAMALINGESWARA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 11-197, KACHERI STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. LADE VENKATA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, OCC. BUSINESS R/ D. NO. 2-56, MAIN ROAD, KOTTAPALLI VILLAGE, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. LADE NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AAED 53 MAARC HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS. R/ D. NO. 3-107, OLD NH-5 ROAD, OPP. R.T.C. COMPLEX, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. LADE TIRUMALA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 48 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 11-217, MAIN ROAD, OPP. POST OFFICE, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. LADE SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-29A, KACHERI STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. LADE NARASIMHA MURTHY,, S/O LATE SATYANARAYNA, (DIED) AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 5- 13/14-132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 6 9. BOYINA BABU RAO,, S/O PEDASOMULU, AGED 84 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 12-251, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. LADE SARAD,, W/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 67 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. HOUSE HOLD DUTIES, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14- 132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 11. LADE RAVI KUMAR,, S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 12. LADE VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 41 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SAKALABAKTULA SADASIVA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SAKALABAKTULA RAMA KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 68 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NN. 4-3-60A, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SAKALABAKTULA SANKARA NARAYANA, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 66 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. SAKALABAKTULA CHANDRABUSHANA GUPTA DIED, S/O LATE GANGA RAO,AGED 64 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SAKALABAKTULA PADMAVATHI, W/O LATE NAGARAJU, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-150, VYSYA 7 STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SAKALABAKTULA HARIHARA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O PLOT NO. 202, BLARAJI RESIDENCY, NEHRU ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 7. SAKALABAKTULA VENKATA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-157, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. SAKALABHAKTULA KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. SAKALABHAKTULA ANIL KUMAR, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O H.NO.10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. SAKALABHAKTULA SUNEEL, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDYO MANOHER REDDY 2. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: 8 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 752/2021 Between: 1. LADE MOHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU BUSINESS, R/O D. NO 8-6-107, MAIN ROAD, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. LADE SASHIBUSHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, HINDU OCCU BUSINESS R/O D. NO. 11-260, KODRA STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. LADE JANARDHANA RAO,, S/O LATE RAMALINGESWARA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 11-197, KACHERI STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. LADE VENKATA RAO, , S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU,OCC BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 2-56, MAIN ROAD, KOTTAPALLI VILLAGE, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. LADE NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, GED 53 YEARS, HINDU, NCCU. RUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 3-107, OLD NH-5 ROAD, OPP. R.T.C. COMPLEX, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. LADE TIRUMALA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 48 YEARS,HINDU,OCC BUSINESS. R/ D. NO. 11-217, MAIN ROAD, OPP. POST OFFICE, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. LADE SRINIVASA RAO, , S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-29A, KACHERI STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. LADE NARASIMHA MURTHY,, S/O LATE SATYANARAYNA, (DIED) AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 5- 13/14-132, VISAKHA B COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 9 9. BOYINA BABU RAO,, S/O PEDASORNULU, AGED 84 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 12-251, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. LADE SARAD,, W/O LATE NARASIRNHA MURTHY, AGED 67 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. HOUSE HOLD DUTIES, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14- 132, VISAKHA B COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 11. LADE RAVI KUMAR,, S/O LATE NARASIRNHA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA B COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 12. LADE VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O LATE NARASINTA MURTHY, AGED 41 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA B COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SAKALABAKTULA SADASIVA RAO DIED, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SAKALABAKTULA RAMA KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 69 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, RIO D. NO. 4-3-60A, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SAKALABAKTULA SANKARA NARAYANA, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 66 YEARS,HINDU,OCC BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. SAKALABAKTULA CHANDRABUSHANA GUPTA DIED, AGED 64 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU.BUSINESS, R/O D. NO.10-1-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SAKALABAKTULA PADNIAVATHI, W/O LATE NAGARAJU, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-150, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10 6. SAKALABAKTULA HARIHARA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O PLOT NO. 202, BLARAJI RESIDENCY, NEHRU ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 7. SAKAIABAKTUIA VENKATA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-157, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. SAKALABHAKTULA KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,OCC HOUSEWIFE,R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. SAKALABHAKTULA ANIL KUMAR, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O H.NO.10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. SAKALABHAKTULA SUNEEL, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 11. SAKALABATTULA GANGA RAO, S/O LATE SADASIVA RAO, HINDU, AGED 50 YEARS, EMPLOYEE, R/O D.NO. 8-3-945/S/601, PLOT NO. 601, 6TH FLOOR, SRI NEELAYYA ESTATE, YELLAREDDYGUDA ROAD, NAGARJUNA NAGAR COLONY, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD. PIN-500016. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: 11 CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 753/2021 Between: 1. LADE MOHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 8-6-107, MAIN ROAD, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. LADE SASHIBUSHANA RAO,, S/O LATE MALLESWARA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 11-260, KODRA STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. LADE JANARDHANA RAO,, S/O LATE RAMALINGESWARA RAO, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 11-197, KACHERI STREET, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. LADE VENKATA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 54 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 2-56, MAIN ROAD, KOTTAPALLI VILLAGE, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. LADE NAGESWARA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 53 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 3-107, OLD NH-5 ROAD, OPP. R.T.C. COMPLEX, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. LADE TIRUMALA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 48 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/ D. NO. 11-217, MAIN ROAD, OPP. POST OFFICE, TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. LADE SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O LATE SRIRAMA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-29A,KACHERI STREET,TEKKALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. LADE NARASIMHA MURTHY,, S/O LATE SATYANARAYNA, (DIED) AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 5- 13/14-132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 12 9. BOYINA BABU RAO,, S/O PEDASOMULU, AGED 84 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. NO AVOCATION, R/O D. NO. 12-251, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. LADE SARAD,, W/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 67 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. HOUSE HOLD DUTIES, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14- 132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 11. LADE RAVI KUMAR,, S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 47 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA B COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 12. LADE VENKATA SATYANARAYANA,, S/O LATE NARASIMHA MURTHY, AGED 41 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 5-13/14-132, VISAKHA 'B' COLONY, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. (PETITIONERS 10 TO 12 WERE ADDED AS LR'S OF DECEASED PETITIONER NO -8 VIDE I.A. NO. 145 OF 2020 DT. 23- 12-2020) ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. SAKALABAKTULA SADASIVA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 75 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. SAKALABAKTULA RAMA KRISHNA RAO, , S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 68 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 4-3-60A, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. SAKALABAKTULA SANKARA NARAYANA, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 66 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. SAKALABAKTULA CHANDRABUSHANA GUPTA DIED, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 64 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, RIO D. NO. 10-1-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 13 5. SAKALABAKTULA PADMAVATHI, W/O LATE NAGARAJU, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-150, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. SAKALABAKTULA HARIHARA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O PLOT NO. 202, BLARAJI RESIDENCY, NEHRU ROAD, SRIKAKULAM TOWN AND DISTRICT. 7. SAKALABAKTULA VENKATA RAO, S/O LATE GANGA RAO, AGED 49 YEARS, HINDU, OCCU. BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 10-1-157, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI VILLAGE - POST AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. MENDA TRINADHA RAO, S/O LATE ADINARAYANA, AGED 36 YEARS, OCCU. BUSINESS R/O JONNALAPADU VILLAGE, KOTABOMMALI R.S. POST SANTABOMMALI MANDALAM, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 9. SAKALABHAKTULA KRISHNA KUMARI, W/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS,OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 10. SAKALABHAKTULA ANIL KUMAR, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O H.NO.10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 11. SAKALABHAKTULA SUNEEL, S/O LATE SAKALABHAKTULA CHANDRABHUSHAN GUPTA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 10-7-128, VYSYA STREET, KOTABOMMALI MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. O MANOHER REDDY The Court made the following: 14 COMMON ORDER:- The Civil Revision Petitions are filed aggrieved by the orders passed in C.R.P.No.750 of 2021 is filed against I.A. No.40 of 2021 in I.A.No.68 of 2021 to implead as respondent. C.R.P.No.751 of 2021 is filed against I.A.No.92 of 2021 in I.A.No.68 of 2020 for amendment of schedule. C.R.P.No. 752 of 2021 is filed against I.A.No.93 of 2021 in I.A.No.69 of 2020 for amendment of schedule. C.R.P.No.753 of 2021 is filed against I.A.No.39 of 2021 to implead GPA in I.A.No.69 of 2020. 2. The petitioners are plaintiffs in O.S.No.5 of 2020 on the file of Senior Civil Judge at Tekali. O.S.No.5 of 2020 was filed for the relief of injunction against the defendants therein over the suit schedule property. The trial Court initially granted injunction, directing the respondents not to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioners in I.A.No.68 of 2020 and further interim order in I.A.No.69 of 2020, directing the defendants/respondents therein not to dispose the suit schedule property or create any third party rights over the suit schedule property. It is submitted that the respondents thereafter resorted to bifurcating the Survey No.4 and by changing the boundaries have created a power of attorney in favour of the 8th defendant who was proposed to be added as party defendant in the suit. The petitioners had filed I.A.No.41 of 2021 in O.S.No.5 of 2020 and the learned Judge allowed the said I.A. and impleaded the proposed party as defendant No.8 in the suit. The petitioners intended to implead the 8th defendant as party respondent in I.A.Nos.68 and 69 of 2020 as well and also proposed to amend 15 the schedule by filing I.A.No.92 of 2021 and I.A.No. 93 of 2021 in I.A.No.68 of 2020 and I.A.Nos.69 of 2020. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the learned Judge on one hand has allowed I.A.No.41 of 2021 and impleaded the GPA holder as 8th defendant in the suit. However on the same day, I.A.Nos.40 of 2021, 92 of 2021, 93 of 2021 and 39 of 2021 were dismissed without assigning any reasons. Learned counsel for the petitioners further submits that when the learned Senior Civil Judge, Tekkali found the defendant a necessary party in the suit and also allowed the amendment of suit schedule property. Nothing should have precluded the learned Judge from allowing the petitioners to implead the 8th defendant as party respondent in the I.As as well. It is also submitted that except for stating that I.A.Nos.68 and 69 of 2020 are dismissed, the necessity for impleading a respondent in the said I.A. would not arise. On these grounds, I.As were dismissed without assigning any reasons. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that I.A.Nos.68 and 69 of 2020 were decided on merits and the learned Judge has also observed the manner in which the petitioners have approached the Court without submitting any documents and by suppression of facts. It is further submitted that the documents which were filed along with the suit could not aid the petitioner in proving possession over the petition schedule properties. It is also submitted that when I.A.Nos.68 and 69 of 2020 were decided on merits, no purpose would be served in impleading when the agent of the 16 respondents as party respondent in I.A which was decided on merits. It is also submitted that the petitioners have filed C.M.A. against the dismissal of I.A.Nos.68 and 69 of 2020 and that the C.M.As are pending adjudication. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the respondents. 6. The short point for consideration is, whether the petitioners can seek for impleading as party respondent in an interlocutory application, which is decided on merits. On the facts of this case, the learned Judge has dismissed the I.A.Nos.68 and 69 of 2020 on merits. The proposed respondent was sought to be impeded as party respondent, while I.A.Nos. 68 and 69 of 2020 were pending adjudication. The learned Judge has taken up all these matters for hearing and heard the matters together and passed orders on 21.06.2021. It is evident from the orders passed in I.A.Nos.68 and 69 that the learned Judge has considered the issue on merits and in totality. 7. Having found that the proposed respondent is only an agent of the other respondents who are already on record, the learned Judge has rejected the petition filed seeking to implead the said respondent and also I.A was filed for amending the schedule of the property. 8. Having allowed the application filed for amending the suit schedule property and also the application filed for impleading the agent of the other respondents as 8th defendant in the main suit, the matter is to be adjudicated on merits and it is open for the parties to raise all contentions before the trial 17 Court, when the matter is taken up for trial or at any other appropriate stage and when the situation demands. 9. At this stage, this Court is not inclined to interfere with the orders passed and accordingly, the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.02.03.2026 SR