104 GURMEET SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: Present: HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) CM-3790 1. delay of 65 2. same is allowed. 3. LPA No.1554 of 2026 (O&M) 4. submits that the claim, was not was discovered later on. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the learned Single Judge on all the possible grounds available. 5. 6. 27-05-2026 Sapna Goyal NOTE: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CM-3790 LPA No.1554 of 2026 Date of Decision : GURMEET SINGH VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Mr. Manjot Gujral, Advocate HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) 3790-LPA-2026 Present application has been filed for see delay of 65 days in filing the present appeal. Keeping in view the averments made in the application allowed. Delay of 65 days in filing the present LPA No.1554 of 2026 (O&M) After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant submits that the allotment letter dated 02.08.1977, which is the basis of the claim, was not brought to the notice of the learned Single Judge, discovered later on. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the learned Single Judge on all the possible grounds available. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) 2026 (DEEPAK MANCHANDA NOTE: Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable: NO IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 3790-3791-LPA-2026 in/and No.1554 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision : 27.05.2026 ........Appellant ERSUS ........Respondents HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI DEEPAK MANCHANDA Manjot Gujral, Advocate for the appellant. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI, J. (Oral) been filed for seeking condonation of present appeal. erments made in the application, the days in filing the present appeal is condoned. ter arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant letter dated 02.08.1977, which is the basis of the the learned Single Judge, as the same discovered later on. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the learned Single Judge on all the possible grounds available. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE / reasoned: YES Whether reportable: NO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI king condonation of , the ter arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the appellant letter dated 02.08.1977, which is the basis of the the same discovered later on. Hence, the present appeal may kindly be disposed of as not pressed any further with liberty to file a review before the learned SAPNA GOYAL 2026.05.29 11:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document