[2026:RJ-JP:3897] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16921/2025 Mahendar Kumar S/o Shri Todaram, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Jatiyo Ka Baas, Sojat City, Police Thana Sojat City, District Pali. Presently Confined In District Jail Beawar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Manohar Lal S/o Tarachand, R/o Motinagar, Saket Nagar, District Beawar, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Divyesh Maheshwari Mr. Jai Prakash Saini Mr. Harsh Vardhan Katara Mr. Ghanshyam Gaur For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/01/2026 1. The instant bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is in custody in connection with FIR No.15/2025 registered at Police Station Saket Nagar, District Beawar for the offences punishable under under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) & 61(2)(a) of the BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. It is submitted that other co-accused person namely Shahadat Ali has already been granted benefit of bail by the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court. It is [2026:RJ-JP:3897] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16921/2025] contended that charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since 14.11.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the bail application. They submit that petitioner is the main culprit of this case and three other cases have been registered against him. 4. Heard. Perused the material available on record. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the fact that alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and aforementioned co-accused person has been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court; trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the custody period, but without commenting anything on the merits and demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Mahendar Kumar S/o Shri Todaram shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2026:RJ-JP:3897] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16921/2025] 7. It is made clear that the accused petitioner shall not involve in any other offence during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in the concerned local police station in the first week of every month till conclusion of trial. 8. Concerned SHO shall enter the attendance of the petitioner in the Roznamcha. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to the petitioner by this Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. 11. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J GAUTAM JAIN /69