KUSH BANNA ALIAS KUSHRAJ SINGH S/O KALU SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/4702/2026 · 2026-04-18
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2102 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 2102 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16482] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4702/2026 Kush Banna Alias Kushraj Singh S/o Kalu Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Surajniyas, P.s. Sandas, District Chittorgarh, Rajasthan. (Presently Confined At District Jail, Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ajatshatru Mina Mr. Manav Sharma Adv. Rhythm Shrimal For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakad, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 18/04/2026
1. This bail application has been filed by the accused petitioner u/S 483 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 125/2025 registered at Police Station Fatehpur Sadar, District Sikar for offence u/S 8 & 15 of the NDPS Act. 2. Heard. 3. Considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor. 4. As per the prosecution, the allegation is that 79.79 Kg. of illegal drug doda chura was said to have been recovered from the possession of Vikas who is said to have purchased the said contraband from Manoj Kumar and the Manoj Kumar is said to have purchased the said contraband from the present petitioner. The petitioner has been arrayed as an accused merely on the
[2026:RJ-JP:16482] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-4702/2026] basis of the statement of the co-accused Manoj Kumar. It is also submitted that the accused peittioner is in custody since 08.092025 and the police after completion of investigation, has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. 5. In criminal jurisprudence, the statement of an accused solely cannot be made the basis for conviction of other accused persons. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and taking into consideration the material fact that no contraband is said to have been recovered from the possession of the present accused, who is in custody since 08.09.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 7. Accordingly, this bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.
50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. In case the accused-petitioner is found to be involved in any other criminal case of similar nature in future, the prosecution may move application for cancellation of his bail. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /63